Review of U.S. International Food Aid Programs
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing serves as a formal oversight review of how the U.S. government allocates resources for global food security, which impacts the scale and method of international humanitarian aid delivery.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Agriculture
The agency is responsible for implementing aspects of international food aid and provided testimony on program operations.
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
The agency manages humanitarian assistance programs and provided testimony regarding their international efforts.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on June 24, 2015, in Room 1300 of the Longworth House Office Building.
- The session was convened by the House Committee on Agriculture to review U.S. international food aid programs.
- The U.S. has maintained international food aid programs for over 60 years.
- Philip C. Karsting (Foreign Agricultural Service) and Thomas H. Staal (USAID) provided testimony.
- The hearing record includes submitted questions and supplementary materials from the witnesses.
Why It Matters
This hearing serves as a formal oversight review of how the U.S. government allocates resources for global food security, which impacts the scale and method of international humanitarian aid delivery.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Oversight
The hearing highlights a 60-year continuity in U.S. international food aid policy, indicating a long-term bipartisan commitment to these programs.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools