POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Indiana House Bill 1068 requires voter approval for utility regulatory commissioners seeking retention

Original title: Retention of IURC commissioners.

Last action · January 22, 2026: Representative Andrade added as coauthorSponsors: Chuck Moseley and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

ers seeking an additional term must have their approved by voters at a general election. Commissioners wishing to run for retention must file a declaration with the secretary of state by noon on July 15 preceding the expiration of their term. If a majority of electors vote no, the commissioner's position becomes vacant when their current term expires.

Why it matters

Changes the appointment and tenure process for state utility regulators by introducing mandatory public elections instead of relying solely on gubernatorial appointments for subsequent terms.

Background
  • The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission consists of five members appointed by the governor to regulate public utilities operating within the state. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission members

Commissioners must secure voter approval via a general election ballot to serve an additional term.

Directly affected

Indiana voters

Voters gain the authority to vote 'yes' or 'no' on whether to retain sitting utility regulatory commissioners.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a commissioner get on the ballot for retention?
The commissioner must file a declaration with the secretary of state no later than noon on the July 15 immediately preceding the general election before their term expires.
What happens if a majority of voters vote 'no' on a commissioner's retention?
The individual's position on the commission becomes vacant upon the expiration of their current term, and they may not continue serving.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Jan 22, 2026House
    Representative Andrade added as coauthor
  2. Dec 5, 2025HouseIntroduced
    First reading: referred to Committee on Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications
  3. Dec 5, 2025House
    Authored by Representative Moseley

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Shift to Voter Retention for Regulators

The bill introduces a retention election mechanism for utility regulatory commissioners, aligning their tenure evaluation process more closely with judicial retention models.

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Chuck Moseley, Mike Andrade and 1 more
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Indiana state legislative body”Map →
PersonChuck Moseley“Representative who introduced House Bill 1068”Map →
PersonMike Andrade“Representative added as coauthor”Map →
OrganizationIndiana Utility Regulatory Commission“State regulatory agency whose members are subject to retention elections”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record