The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Kentucky bill authorizes cities to establish project workforce agreements and local prevailing wages for public construction over $1 million
Last action · January 21, 2026: to Local Government (H)Sponsors: Adam Moore and 1 other
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Kentucky cities are newly authorized to enact ordinances requiring contractors on public construction projects costing over $1 million to register with apprenticeship programs and pay local s. The legislation also permits local governments to negotiate s and set minimum wage and leave rates exceeding state and federal baselines.
Local contractors bidding on public projects exceeding $1 million in participating Kentucky cities may face mandatory apprenticeship and wage requirements, altering bidding conditions and labor costs.
- Local prevailing wage laws and project workforce agreements are recurring subjects of legislative debate in state assemblies concerning municipal contracting costs and labor standards. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Contractors bidding on public construction projects
Contractors bidding on municipal projects over $1 million may be subject to mandatory apprenticeship registration and local prevailing wage payment requirements.
City legislative bodies
Cities gain discretionary authority to enact local prevailing wage rates, apprenticeship preferences, project workforce agreements, and higher minimum wage or leave standards.
Key Facts
- Cities may enact ordinances establishing a mandatory bidding preference for public construction project contractors registered with an apprenticeship and training program.
- A public construction project is defined as any local or state-funded public improvement or building project within city boundaries with an aggregate cost over $1,000,000.
- City legislative bodies may negotiate all terms of a project workforce agreement, including wage provisions exceeding state or federal minimums, notwithstanding KRS Chapter 337.
- Cities may establish a prevailing wage rate and require employers to pay it on public works projects estimated to cost at least $1,000,000.
Show all 6 facts
- Prevailing wage ordinances must include trade classifications, wage rate schedules, record-keeping processes, compliance investigations, and penalties.
- City, county, and merged local governments are authorized to adopt and enforce minimum wage ordinances exceeding state and federal levels and mandate employee leave.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which public construction projects are subject to these local apprenticeship and wage rules?
Can Kentucky cities set minimum wage rates higher than the state or federal minimum?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Jan 21, 2026HouseCommitteeto Local Government (H)
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroducedintroduced in House to Committee on Committees (H)
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Municipal Labor Authority
The bill shifts authority to local legislative bodies to set prevailing wages and project workforce agreements, altering previous state-level limitations.
Connected Entities
Sources
apps.legislature.ky.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz35Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
