POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofGaming →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Massachusetts Senate bill restricts sports betting formats, bans commission-based compensation for operators, and mandates player tracking data sharing

Original title: An Act addressing economic, health and social harms caused by sports betting

Last action · March 9, 2026: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and MeansSponsors: John Keenan and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts Senate Bill 302 bans in-play and , caps daily and monthly wagers unless an is conducted, and prohibits sports wagering operators from paying staff commissions based on customer wager percentages. The measure also doubles various fines, mandates annual submission of anonymized player tracking data to research entities, and applies consumer protection regulations to sports betting promotional advertising.

Why it matters

Sports bettors face new wagering caps and restrictions on bet types, while gaming operators face prohibitions on staff commission structures, mandatory data sharing, and broader consumer protection liability for promotional ads.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

sports wagering operators

Operators face restrictions on bet types, mandatory affordability assessments for high-volume wagers, a ban on percentage-based staff compensation, increased fine caps, and requirements to submit customer tracking data.

Directly affected

sports bettors

Bettors are prohibited from placing in-play and proposition bets, face wagering caps above certain thresholds unless affordability is verified, and have their anonymized gaming behavior data shared with researchers.

Directly affected

research entities

Qualified nonprofit research entities receive anonymized player tracking data to analyze gambling addiction and develop harm minimization and monitoring systems.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there limits on how much money a person can wager?
Yes. Operators cannot accept wagers exceeding $1,000 per day or $10,000 per month from an individual unless the operator performs an proving that the amounts do not exceed 15 percent of the person's available bank funds.
How is player data used for research purposes?
Mobile and digital platform operators must annually supply player tracking data to the commission. The commission contracts with a nonprofit research entity to remove personally identifying information and make the anonymized data available to qualified researchers studying gambling addiction and harm minimization.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Mar 9, 2026SenateCommittee
    Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means
  2. Jan 15, 2026Senate
    Reporting date extended to Friday March 6, 2026
  3. Nov 13, 2025Joint
    Hearing rescheduled to 11/13/2025 from 11:00 AM-02:00 PM in A-2 and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to New End Time</span>
  4. Oct 31, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 11/13/2025 from 11:00 AM-01:00 PM in A-2
  5. Feb 27, 2025House
    House concurred
  6. Feb 27, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Shift from permissive sports betting to stringent consumer and addiction controls

The bill moves away from open wagering models by banning in-play and prop bets, capping wagers based on bank accounts, and mandating research data collection.

Connected Entities

Pat Jehlen, John Cronin, John Keenan and 2 more
PersonPat Jehlen“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 302”Map →
PersonJohn Cronin“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 302”Map →
PersonJohn Keenan“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 302”Map →
PersonPeter Durant“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 302”Map →
PersonLindsay Sabadosa“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 302”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record