POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofOsha →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Review of OSHA's Silica Exposure Standards

Original title: REVIEWING RECENT CHANGES TO OSHA'S SILICA STANDARDS

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2016 House Subcommittee hearing regarding new federal regulations on silica dust exposure in the workplace. The hearing featured testimony from industry representatives, labor health researchers, and legal experts regarding the impact and implementation of 's updated standards.

Why it matters

The hearing examined the implementation of 's 2016 silica rule, which set new limits on worker exposure to dust to prevent respiratory diseases like .

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Construction and Manufacturing Employers

These businesses must comply with new OSHA standards regarding silica dust monitoring and exposure controls.

Directly affected

Workers in high-exposure industries

These individuals are subject to new safety protocols intended to reduce their inhalation of crystalline silica.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 19, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections.
  • The subject was the review of OSHA's updated standards regarding crystalline silica exposure.
  • The hearing included testimony from four primary witnesses representing construction, manufacturing, and labor health research sectors.
  • The record includes numerous supplemental submissions from industry associations, labor unions, and public health organizations.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing addressed the balance between workplace safety regulations and the operational costs for businesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of OSHA's silica standards?
The standards are designed to limit worker exposure to respirable , which can cause serious respiratory diseases such as .
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included representatives from the construction industry, manufacturing, labor health research, and legal counsel specializing in workplace safety.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory Review

The hearing highlights the legislative oversight process used to challenge or review new federal agency rules shortly after their implementation.

Connected Entities

Janis Herschkowitz, Henry Chajet, Tim Walberg and 4 more
PersonJanis Herschkowitz“CEO of PRL Inc.”Map →
PersonHenry Chajet“Shareholder at Jackson Lewis P.C.”Map →
PersonTim Walberg“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections”Map →
OrganizationOSHA“Occupational Safety and Health Administration”Map →
PersonEd Brady“President of Brady Homes of Illinois”Map →
PersonJames Melius“Director of Research, Laborers' Health and Safety Fund of North America”Map →
PersonFrederica S. Wilson“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record