POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S1582FEDERALsigned
Enacted

The GENIUS Act: Regulating Payment Stablecoins

Original title: GENIUS Act

May 1, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Current status: signed.

Last action
Became Public Law No: 119-27.Jul 18, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This law creates the first comprehensive federal rules for companies that issue or manage stablecoins, determining which entities are legally permitted to operate and how they must handle digital assets used for payments.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Stablecoin Issuers

Issuers must now meet federal approval criteria and comply with new regulatory definitions to operate.

Digital Asset Service Providers

These entities are now subject to specific federal definitions and regulatory oversight regarding their business activities.

Software Developers

Developers of distributed ledger protocols are explicitly excluded from the definition of digital asset service providers.

What changed

Current stage: signed.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The GENIUS Act establishes a federal regulatory framework for 'payment stablecoins,' which are digital assets designed to maintain a stable value relative to national currencies. The law defines key terms for digital assets and service providers and sets criteria for entities authorized to issue these stablecoins.

Key Facts

  • The Act defines 'payment stablecoin' as a digital asset used for payment or settlement where the issuer is obligated to redeem it for a fixed amount of monetary value.
  • The Act establishes a category of 'Federal qualified payment stablecoin issuer' which includes specific nonbank entities, uninsured national banks, and Federal branches approved by the Comptroller.
  • Digital asset service providers are defined as entities that exchange, transfer, or hold digital assets for profit, but the definition explicitly excludes developers of distributed ledger protocols or self-custodial software.
  • The Act provides a legal definition for 'lawful order,' which allows federal agencies or courts to require issuers to seize, freeze, or burn stablecoins under specific conditions.
  • The definition of 'payment stablecoin' excludes national currencies, traditional bank deposits, and assets already classified as securities under existing federal law.
  • The Act defines 'distributed ledger' as technology that shares data across a network to create a public, cryptographically secured ledger of transactions.
  • The Act defines 'monetary value' as national currency or deposits denominated in national currency.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a payment stablecoin?
It is a digital asset designed to be used for payments that an issuer promises to redeem for a fixed amount of national currency, maintaining a stable value.
Does this law apply to software developers?
No, the Act explicitly excludes developers of protocols and self-custodial software interfaces from the definition of 'digital asset service provider'.
Can the government freeze my stablecoins?
The Act defines a 'lawful order' process, which allows courts or federal agencies to order the seizure or freezing of stablecoins if they meet specific legal requirements.

Why It Matters

This law creates the first comprehensive federal rules for companies that issue or manage stablecoins, determining which entities are legally permitted to operate and how they must handle digital assets used for payments.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

MEHLMAN CONSULTING, INC.

on behalf of NORTHERN TRUST

CRYPTO COUNCIL FOR INNOVATION

$300,000

Voting Record

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Exclusion of Developers

The Act explicitly carves out software developers and protocol operators from the definition of regulated service providers, signaling a legislative intent to focus regulation on issuers rather than infrastructure builders.

Connected Entities

organizationFederal Deposit Insurance CorporationDefined as the 'Corporation' under the Act.Map →
organizationBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDefined as the 'Board' under the Act.Map →
organizationOffice of the Comptroller of the CurrencyResponsible for approving nonbank entities and national banks to issue payment sMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record