Congressional Hearing on Ethics and Legal Allegations at HUD
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing represents a formal congressional inquiry into the internal conduct and administrative integrity of a major federal agency, which could lead to changes in HUD's operational policies or oversight procedures.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
The agency is the subject of an investigation into its internal ethical and legal compliance.
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
The subcommittee is exercising its legislative oversight authority to examine agency conduct.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on February 4, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The primary subject was an Inspector General report regarding allegations of improper lobbying and obstruction at HUD.
- Witnesses included David A. Montoya (HUD Inspector General) and Edda Emmanuelli Perez (GAO Managing Associate General Counsel).
- The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on Financial Services.
- The proceedings were recorded as Serial No. 114-2.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing represents a formal congressional inquiry into the internal conduct and administrative integrity of a major federal agency, which could lead to changes in HUD's operational policies or oversight procedures.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on Agency Oversight
The hearing highlights a specific effort by the 114th Congress to utilize the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations to scrutinize HUD's internal management.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools