POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on Denver VA Hospital Construction Overruns

Original title: FIELD HEARING ON DENVER REPLACEMENT MEDICAL CENTER

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs held a in Aurora, Colorado, to investigate significant cost overruns at the Denver Replacement Medical Center. Senators and representatives gathered to hold the Department of Veterans Affairs accountable for a 427% increase in project costs from its original estimate.

Why it matters

The hearing addresses the management and funding of a major federal infrastructure project that has seen costs balloon by 427% over initial projections, directly impacting the timeline and resources available for veteran healthcare in the Denver region.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Veterans in the Denver region

The construction delays and budget issues impact the availability and timeline of medical services provided at the facility.

Directly affected

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

The agency is under congressional scrutiny regarding its management and oversight of the construction project.

Key Facts

  • The Denver Replacement Medical Center project experienced a 427% cost overrun compared to its initial inception estimate.
  • The hearing was held on April 24, 2015, at the Aurora Municipal Center in Aurora, Colorado.
  • The Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs is conducting field hearings to investigate VA management failures and ensure veteran service delivery.
  • The committee previously investigated opiate over-prescription in Wisconsin and appointment cancellations in Phoenix, Arizona.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing included testimony from the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was this hearing held in Colorado instead of Washington, D.C.?
The Committee on Veterans' Affairs adopted a policy to hold hearings in the locations where problems are occurring to better hold the VA accountable and see issues firsthand.
What is the primary issue with the Denver VA hospital project?
The project has faced massive cost overruns, specifically cited as 427% higher than the original cost estimate.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Shift to Field Oversight

The committee explicitly moved away from Washington-based hearings to local field hearings to increase accountability for VA failures.

Connected Entities

Michael F. Bennet, Johnny Isakson, U.S. Government Accountability Office and 4 more
PersonMichael F. Bennet“U.S. Senator from Colorado”Map →
PersonJohnny Isakson“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Government Accountability Office“Provided testimony on infrastructure issues”Map →
locationDenver Replacement Medical Center“The VA hospital project in Aurora, CO, subject of the hearing”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Army Corps of Engineers“Involved in the construction oversight”Map →
PersonCory Gardner“U.S. Senator from Colorado”Map →
PersonRichard Blumenthal“Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record