POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Ohio HB 578 requires mandatory reporting of tick-related diseases and Alpha-gal syndrome to the Department of Health

Original title: Require tick-related disease reporting to Department of Health

Last action · March 25, 2026: Referred to HealthSponsors: Rodney Creech and 16 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 578 requires health care providers, coroners, and local health authorities to promptly report cases of and tick-related diseases to the Department of Health. The measure amends existing disease reporting statutes to include specific zoonotic, vector-borne, foodborne, and waterborne conditions. Violations of these reporting requirements are prohibited by law.

Why it matters

Local medical professionals, hospitals, and county health departments must update their tracking and reporting protocols to include tick-borne illnesses and , altering compliance obligations for health care entities across the state.

Background
  • House Bill 578 was introduced during the 136th General Assembly regular session in Ohio to update statutory disease reporting mandates administered by the state Department of Health. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Health care providers

Hospitals, clinics, physicians, nurses, and laboratories must promptly report newly mandated conditions such as Alpha-gal syndrome and tick-related diseases to the state.

Directly affected

Boards of health and coroners

Local health authorities, boards, and medical examiners are bound by mandatory reporting rules for vector-borne and zoonotic diseases.

Directly affected

Department of Health

The agency receives, processes, and manages the expanded data reports regarding contagious illnesses and tick-related conditions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is required to report tick-related diseases under this bill?
Boards of health, health authorities, coroners, medical examiners, and health care providers in localities without health authorities must report the specified conditions.
What specific new conditions are added to the reporting list?
The bill explicitly adds and tick-related diseases and conditions, along with broader categories like foodborne, waterborne, and zoonotic or vector-borne diseases.
Does the bill allow patient medical data to be made public?
governed by section 3701.17 of the Revised Code can only be released according to that section, but data that does not identify an individual may be shared in summary, statistical, or aggregate form.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Mar 25, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Health
  2. Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Passed
  4. Feb 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported - Substitute (Health)
  5. Nov 12, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Health
  6. Nov 5, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history & redline

3 versions on file
Comparing As Reported by the House Health Committee → As Passed by the House
removed addedOfficial text
removed: hb578_01_RH added: hb578_02_PH As removed: Reported added: Passed by the House removed: Health Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session Sub. H. B. No. 578 2025-2026 Representatives Creech, Schmidt added: Cosponsors: Representatives Brennan, Deeter, Ghanbari, Hiner, John, Johnson, Mathews, A., Miller, J., Miller, K., Peterson, Robb Blasdel, Salvo, Somani, Williams, Willis To amend section 3701.23 of the Revised Code to modify disease reporting requirements. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF […]
Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Voting Record

Show 1 earlier roll call
Motion succeededHouse2/25/2026Ohio LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Passed

Total

91

Yes
91
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (93)

69 more members
James M. HoopsParty not recordedyes
Diane MullinsParty not recordedyes
Kevin MillerParty not recordedyes
Sean BrennanParty not recordedyes
Andrea WhiteParty not recordedyes
Tom YoungParty not recordedyes
Jennifer GrossParty not recordedyes
Monica Robb BlasdelParty not recordedyes
Joseph A. Miller, IIIParty not recordedyes
Kellie DeeterParty not recordedyes
Levi DeanParty not recordedyes
Tracy RichardsonParty not recordedyes
Dani IsaacsohnParty not recordedyes
Ty MathewsParty not recordedyes
Ismail MohamedParty not recordedyes
Scott OelslagerParty not recordedyes
Justin PizzulliParty not recordedyes
Michelle TeskaParty not recordedyes
Nick SantucciParty not recordedyes
Beryl PiccolantonioParty not recordedyes
Sharon A. RayParty not recordedyes
Gayle ManningParty not recordedyes
Ty MooreParty not recordedyes
Michele GrimParty not recordedyes
Jean SchmidtParty not recordedyes
D.J. SwearingenParty not recordedyes
Thaddeus J. ClaggettParty not recordedyes
Munira AbdullahiParty not recordedyes
Brian StewartParty not recordedyes
Adam MathewsParty not recordedyes
Terrence UpchurchParty not recordedyes
Eric SynenbergParty not recordedno
Lauren McNallyParty not recordedyes
Marilyn JohnParty not recordedyes
Jeff LaReParty not recordedyes
Meredith CraigParty not recordedyes
Bob PetersonParty not recordedyes
Derrick HallParty not recordedyes
Cindy AbramsParty not recordedyes
Brian LorenzParty not recordedyes
Angela N. KingParty not recordedyes
Rachel BakerParty not recordedyes
Beth LearParty not recordedyes
Elgin RogersParty not recordedyes
Jack DanielsParty not recordedyes
Daniel P. TroyParty not recordedyes
Roy KlopfensteinParty not recordedyes
Allison RussoParty not recordedno
Tristan RaderParty not recordedno
Meredith R. Lawson-RoweParty not recordedyes
Heidi WorkmanParty not recordedyes
Sarah Fowler ArthurParty not recordedyes
Tim BarhorstParty not recordedyes
Crystal LettParty not recordedyes
Chris GlassburnParty not recordedyes
Riordan McClainParty not recordedyes
Phil PlummerParty not recordedyes
Cecil ThomasParty not recordedyes
Karen BrownleeParty not recordedyes
Michael D. DovillaParty not recordedyes
Matthew KishmanParty not recordedyes
Adam HolmesParty not recordedyes
Christine CockleyParty not recordedno
Thomas HallParty not recordedyes
Josh WilliamsParty not recordedyes
Jason StephensParty not recordedyes
Steve DemetriouParty not recordedyes
Matt HuffmanParty not recordedyes
Bill RoemerParty not recordedyes

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of State Disease Surveillance

The legislation broadens Ohio's mandatory health reporting framework to explicitly capture tick-borne illnesses and Alpha-gal syndrome.

Connected Entities

Rodney Creech, Department of Health, Revised Code and 1 more
PersonRodney Creech“State Representative, District 40, primary sponsor of the bill.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Health“Receives prompt reports of specified diseases and conditions from health provide”Map →
OrganizationRevised Code“Statutory code amended by the bill, specifically section 3701.23 and section 370”Map →
PersonJean Schmidt“State Representative, District 62, primary sponsor of the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record