POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Review of the 2021 Budget for Cybersecurity and Science Agencies

Original title: RESOURCING DHS'S CYBERSECURITY AND INNOVATION MISSIONS: A REVIEW OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2021 BUDGET REQUEST FOR THE CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AGENCY AND THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examines the funding levels proposed for federal agencies responsible for protecting national infrastructure and cybersecurity, which directly impacts the resources available for election security and technological defense.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)

The agency's budget and operational priorities for fiscal year 2021 are the primary subject of the review.

Science and Technology Directorate

The directorate's funding and research mission are being evaluated for the 2021 fiscal year.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This hearing transcript documents a House Subcommittee meeting held on March 11, 2020, to review the 2021 budget requests for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 11, 2020, in the Cannon House Office Building.
  • The purpose was to review the fiscal year 2021 budget requests for CISA and the Science and Technology Directorate.
  • The Cyberspace Solarium Commission report was scheduled for release on the same day as the hearing.
  • Chairman Richmond expressed interest in whether the proposed budget is sufficient to implement recommendations from the Cyberspace Solarium Commission.
  • The hearing included testimony from Christopher C. Krebs (CISA) and Andre Hentz (Science and Technology Directorate).

Why It Matters

The hearing examines the funding levels proposed for federal agencies responsible for protecting national infrastructure and cybersecurity, which directly impacts the resources available for election security and technological defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review and discuss the proposed 2021 budget for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Science and Technology Directorate.
Who testified at the hearing?
Christopher C. Krebs, Director of CISA, and Andre Hentz, Acting Deputy Under Secretary for Science and Technology, provided testimony.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Integration of Solarium Commission Recommendations

The hearing highlights an early legislative effort to align DHS budget requests with the findings of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission.

Connected Entities

personCedric L. RichmondChairman of the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and InMap →
personChristopher C. KrebsDirector of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)Map →
personWilliam BryanSenior Official Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary for Science and TecMap →
organizationScience and Technology DirectorateDHS research and development armMap →
personJim LangevinMember of Congress and contributor to the Cyberspace Solarium CommissionMap →
organizationCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AgencyDHS agency focused on cybersecurity and infrastructure protectionMap →
personAndre HentzActing Deputy Under Secretary for Science and TechnologyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record