POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts updates Energy Facilities Siting Board review duties for transmission, pipelines, and generating facilities

Original title: An Act relative to the Energy Facilities Siting Board

Last action · April 6, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5323Sponsor: Mike Day

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts amends energy siting laws to require the to evaluate transmission lines, natural gas pipelines, and oil facilities based on environmental impact, public health, resident wellbeing, and cost, while limiting its review of strictly to environmental impacts.

Why it matters

Changes how energy infrastructure projects are evaluated across the state by expanding specific review criteria for pipelines and transmission lines while restricting generating facility reviews.

Background
  • The Energy Facilities Siting Board is a Massachusetts state board that reviews proposed energy transmission and generation projects. context
  • Michael S. Day is a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives representing Stoneham. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Energy Facilities Siting Board

The board's statutory review criteria and consultation mandates for energy infrastructure are modified.

Directly affected

residents abutting the project

Project evaluations must explicitly consider the minimum impact on the overall wellbeing of residents abutting the project.

Directly affected

department of fish and game

The agency is required to provide testimony when environmental stewardship concerns are raised.

Directly affected

department of public health

The agency is required to provide testimony when public health concerns are raised.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the Energy Facilities Siting Board evaluate under the bill?
The board evaluates environmental impacts, public health, resident wellbeing, need, and cost for transmission lines, pipelines, and oil facilities, while reviewing only environmental impacts for .
Which state agencies must be consulted during reviews?
The board must solicit and consider testimony from the department of fish and game and the department of public health.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Apr 6, 2026House
    Accompanied a study order, see H5323
  2. Dec 4, 2025House
    Reporting date extended to Wednesday, March 18, 2026
  3. Sep 30, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 10/09/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2
  4. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
  5. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Energy Facilities Siting Board, department of public health, Mike Day and 1 more
OrganizationEnergy Facilities Siting Board“Energy board established within the department to review energy facilities.”Map →
Organizationdepartment of public health“Consulted by the board for public health concerns.”Map →
PersonMike Day“Representative who filed the petition for H.3473.”Map →
Organizationdepartment of fish and game“Consulted by the board for environmental stewardship concerns.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record