The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Rhode Island Bill Requires Courts to Decide Legal Questions Without Deference to State Agencies
Last action · February 3, 2026: Committee postponed at request of sponsor (02/05/2026)Sponsors: David Place and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
State courts reviewing an agency decision upon appeal are required to decide all questions of law independently, without giving to any previous determination or interpretation of the law by the agency.
Changes the standard of review for individuals and businesses appealing state agency decisions, ensuring courts interpret legal questions independently rather than relying on agency expertise or prior legal interpretations.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
State agencies
Appellants challenging agency decisions
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does this bill change how courts review state agency decisions?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- Feb 3, 2026Committee postponed at request of sponsor (02/05/2026)
- Jan 30, 2026Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration
- Jan 28, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, referred to House State Government & Elections
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Connected Entities
Sources
status.rilegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
