POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri bill prohibits ESG-based contracting discrimination and creates restricted financial institution list

Original title: Prohibits giving preferential treatment or discrimination based upon ESG scores

Last action · January 27, 2026: Second Read and Referred S Insurance and Banking CommitteeSponsor: Mike Moon

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Senate Bill 1302 prohibits state agencies and political subdivisions from giving preferential treatment or discriminating based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores when awarding public contracts. The measure requires the State Treasurer to maintain a restricted financial institution list of banks engaged in energy or agricultural s, excluding them from state s.

Why it matters

Financial institutions placed on the state's restricted list risk losing eligibility for state s, while companies that provide false information regarding s face civil penalties equal to three times the monies paid by the state.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Financial institutions

Financial institutions face potential exclusion from state banking contracts if they are placed on the restricted financial institution list for engaging in boycotts.

Directly affected

State contractors and subcontractors

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers a financial institution's placement on the restricted list?
A financial institution is placed on the list if it engages in a without a reasonable business purpose, such as refusing to deal with or terminating business activities with companies in fossil fuels, agriculture, mining, or timber.
Can financial institutions defend themselves before being placed on the list?
Yes, the state treasurer must send a written notice 45 days prior to listing, giving the institution 30 days to demonstrate that it is not engaged in a .
What penalties apply to companies that provide false information?
Companies that provide false information to the state treasurer and receive state monies must pay a civil penalty equal to three times all monies paid to the company by the state.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Check Your Understanding

1.According to bill version 5658S.01I, what action may the state treasurer take regarding restricted financial institutions when selecting a financial institution for a banking contract?

2.According to bill version 5658S.01I, what is the state treasurer required to create and maintain?

3.According to bill version 5658S.01I, what must state entities and political subdivisions ensure regarding bidders, offerors, contractors, or subcontractors when procuring or letting contracts?

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Jan 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Second Read and Referred S Insurance and Banking Committee
  2. Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroduced
    S First Read
  3. Dec 1, 2025Senate
    Prefiled

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. The text on record is the 5658S.01I - Introduced version. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Prohibition of ESG Factors in Public Procurement

The bill explicitly forbids state agencies and political subdivisions from utilizing ESG evaluations when awarding public contracts.

Connected Entities

General Assembly, State Treasurer, Mike Moon
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“The legislative body enacting the statutes.”Map →
OrganizationState Treasurer“Responsible for creating and maintaining the restricted financial institution li”Map →
PersonMike Moon“State Senator who introduced Senate Bill 1302.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.senate.mo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record