POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HJRES172FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Proposed Constitutional Amendment to Change Birthright Citizenship Rules

Original title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to protect United States citizenship.

May 4, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.May 4, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If ratified, this amendment would change the requirements for U.S. citizenship at birth, potentially excluding children born in the U.S. to parents who do not meet the specified legal status criteria.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents

Their eligibility for birthright citizenship would be determined by the legal status of their parents under the proposed criteria.

State Legislatures

They are responsible for the ratification process required to make this amendment part of the Constitution.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

H.J. Res. 172 proposes a Constitutional amendment that would restrict birthright citizenship. Under this proposal, a person born in the U.S. would only be considered a citizen if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen, a legal permanent resident, or an immigrant with legal status serving in the U.S. Armed Forces.

Key Facts

  • The resolution proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding the definition of 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States' under the 14th Amendment.
  • To be considered a citizen at birth, a person born in the U.S. must have at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or national.
  • Alternatively, a person born in the U.S. qualifies for citizenship if at least one parent is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence residing in the U.S.
  • A person born in the U.S. also qualifies if at least one parent has lawful status under immigration laws and is performing active service in the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • The amendment requires ratification by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states to become part of the Constitution.
  • The ratification process must be completed within seven years of the resolution's submission.
  • The resolution grants Congress the power to enforce the article through legislation.
  • The resolution requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate to be proposed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill immediately change citizenship laws?
No. This is a proposal for a Constitutional amendment. It must be passed by two-thirds of both the House and Senate and then ratified by three-fourths of the states before it can take effect.
Who would be affected by this change?
The amendment would change citizenship eligibility for children born in the U.S. to parents who are not U.S. citizens, legal permanent residents, or legal immigrants serving in the military.

Why It Matters

If ratified, this amendment would change the requirements for U.S. citizenship at birth, potentially excluding children born in the U.S. to parents who do not meet the specified legal status criteria.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Restriction of 14th Amendment interpretation

The bill explicitly seeks to narrow the scope of the 14th Amendment's 'jurisdiction' clause, which has historically been interpreted to grant citizenship to almost everyone born on U.S. soil.

Connected Entities

organizationCommittee on the JudiciaryThe House committee to which the resolution was referred.Map →
personMr. FullerMember of the House of Representatives who introduced the resolution.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance95
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record