The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Proposed Constitutional Amendment to Change Birthright Citizenship Rules
Last action · May 4, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Sponsors: Clay Fuller and 6 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
H.J. Res. 172 proposes a Constitutional amendment that would restrict birthright citizenship. Under this proposal, a person born in the U.S. would only be considered a citizen if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen, a legal permanent resident, or an immigrant with legal status serving in the U.S. Armed Forces.
If ratified, this amendment would change the requirements for U.S. citizenship at birth, potentially excluding children born in the U.S. to parents who do not meet the specified legal status criteria.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents
Their eligibility for birthright citizenship would be determined by the legal status of their parents under the proposed criteria.
State Legislatures
They are responsible for the ratification process required to make this amendment part of the Constitution.
Key Facts
- The resolution proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding the definition of 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States' under the 14th Amendment.
- To be considered a citizen at birth, a person born in the U.S. must have at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or national.
- Alternatively, a person born in the U.S. qualifies for citizenship if at least one parent is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence residing in the U.S.
- A person born in the U.S. also qualifies if at least one parent has lawful status under immigration laws and is performing active service in the U.S. Armed Forces.
Show all 8 facts
- The amendment requires ratification by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states to become part of the Constitution.
- The ratification process must be completed within seven years of the resolution's submission.
- The resolution grants Congress the power to enforce the article through legislation.
- The resolution requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate to be proposed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill immediately change citizenship laws?
Who would be affected by this change?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
2 actions- May 4, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- May 4, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 2 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Restriction of 14th Amendment interpretation
The bill explicitly seeks to narrow the scope of the 14th Amendment's 'jurisdiction' clause, which has historically been interpreted to grant citizenship to almost everyone born on U.S. soil.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance95How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy90Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools