Congressional Hearing on Terrorism Threats in North Africa
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing informs federal legislative and oversight efforts regarding U.S. counterterrorism strategy and resource allocation in the North African region.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security
The committee uses the testimony to guide legislative oversight and policy development regarding counterterrorism.
Expert Witnesses
The witnesses provided professional analysis and responded to follow-up questions from committee members.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on March 29, 2017, at 10:03 a.m. in room HVC-210 of the Capitol Visitor Center.
- The hearing was convened by the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence of the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- Four expert witnesses provided testimony: J. Peter Pham, Geoff D. Porter, Laith Alkhouri, and Frederic Wehrey.
- The hearing focused on examining the threat of terrorism specifically within the North African region.
- The record includes written statements and follow-up questions submitted by members of the subcommittee to the witnesses.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing informs federal legislative and oversight efforts regarding U.S. counterterrorism strategy and resource allocation in the North African region.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Extensive Follow-up Record
The document contains a significant appendix of follow-up questions from committee members to the witnesses, indicating a high level of engagement with the expert testimony.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools