POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Senator Garcia requires health care practitioners to report pharmaceutical benefits in Florida

Original title: Transparency in Health Care

Last action · March 13, 2026: Died in Health PolicySponsor: Ileana Garcia

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill requires health care practitioners to report any s received from pharmaceutical companies to the Department of Health on at least a quarterly basis, starting July 1, 2026. The Department must create a searchable online database for these reports, and the Auditor General must conduct annual compliance audits. Violations can result in disciplinary action or first-degree misdemeanor charges for repeat offenses.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Health care practitioners

Must report personal benefits from pharmaceutical companies quarterly, follow new ethical guidelines, and face disciplinary action or misdemeanor charges for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Pharmaceutical companies

Directly affected

Department of Health

Required to establish uniform reporting procedures, create and maintain a public online database, and set ethical practice guidelines.

Directly affected

Auditor General

Required to perform annual audits to monitor compliance, verify data accuracy, and address conflicts of interest.

Directly affected

General public

Gains access to a searchable online database tracking personal benefits received by health care practitioners from pharmaceutical companies.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered a "personal benefit" under this bill?
It includes any economic or noneconomic benefit or advantage received outside of a doctor-patient relationship, such as investment interests, gifts, financial incentives, kickback fees, speaking fees, sponsored travel, research funding, and free samples.
What happens if a health care practitioner fails to comply?
A first violation is grounds for disciplinary action by the applicable board, while a second or subsequent violation constitutes a .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 13, 2026SenateFloor
    Died in Health Policy
  2. Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Dec 9, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Health Policy; Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; Fiscal Policy
  4. Nov 19, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Filed

Version history & redline

2 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 1 linked text is unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing Filed → Filed
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$90,385across 20 reported contributions
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$50,000PARTY COMMITTEENov 2025
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,730AFFILIATED PARTY COMMITTEESep 2025
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,583PARTY COMMITTEEMay 2026
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,532PARTY COMMITTEEApr 2026
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,516PARTY COMMITTEEJan 2026
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,516PARTY COMMITTEEDec 2025
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,513PARTY COMMITTEEMar 2026
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,490PARTY COMMITTEEMar 2026
Show 12 more contributions
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$3,369PARTY COMMITTEEDec 2025
Ileana GarciaFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC$2,137PARTY COMMITTEEOct 2025
Ileana GarciaCYBER CITIZENS FOR JUSTICE INC$1,000ADVOCACY GROUPMar 2025
Ileana GarciaCUSCO ENRIQUE$1,000CEO/OLE MEDIA SERVICESApr 2026
Ileana GarciaCOALITION OF ATTAINABLE HOUSING PROVIDERS PC$1,000POLITICAL COMMITTEEDec 2025
Ileana GarciaDADE COUNTY POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION P.A.C.$1,000POLITICAL COMMITTEEJan 2026
Ileana GarciaA STRONGER FLORIDA$1,000POLITICAL COMMITTEEJan 2026
Ileana GarciaCLOSTER FARMS INC$1,000AGRICULTUREMar 2025
Ileana GarciaFERNANDEZ RUDY$1,000EXEC VP/UNIVERSITY OF MIAMIMar 2026
Ileana GarciaCHEVRON USA INC$1,000ENERGY CORPORATIONJan 2026
Ileana GarciaARMAG III LLC$1,000REAL ESTATEMay 2026
Ileana GarciaCHAMIZO IVETTE$1,000REAL ESTATE BROKERJan 2026

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory Public Transparency Database

Shifts practitioner-pharma interactions from private arrangements to a mandatory, publicly searchable state database managed by the Department of Health.

Connected Entities

Department of Health, Auditor General, Florida Legislature

Sources

Open source document

www.flsenate.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record