Congressional Hearing on National Science Foundation Staffing Practices
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing examines the management of temporary staff at the National Science Foundation, which impacts how the agency oversees scientific research funding and administrative operations.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
National Science Foundation employees
The management and oversight policies discussed directly impact the employment conditions and administrative procedures for NSF staff.
Scientific research community
Changes in NSF staffing management can influence how research grants are processed and how the agency interacts with the scientific community.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on June 25, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The hearing was a joint session of the Subcommittee on Oversight and the Subcommittee on Research and Technology.
- The primary subject was the management of the NSF's 'rotating' staff program.
- Witnesses included the NSF Inspector General and the NSF Chief Operating Officer.
- The hearing record includes opening statements, oral and written testimony, and post-hearing questions.
Why It Matters
The hearing examines the management of temporary staff at the National Science Foundation, which impacts how the agency oversees scientific research funding and administrative operations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the 'rotating staff' program at the NSF?
Why was this hearing held?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Oversight
The document provides a snapshot of 2015-era congressional oversight priorities regarding federal agency staffing.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools