POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Michigan House Bill 5592 Establishes Licensure and Inspection Fees for Freestanding Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Facilities

Original title: Health facilities: other; licensure of freestanding hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilities; provide for.

Last action · March 3, 2026: bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026Sponsors: Julie Rogers and 23 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill establishes a state licensing and inspection framework for freestanding hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilities, requiring an initial license application fee of $2,000.00, an annual facility fee of $500.00, and $100.00 per . It mandates that fee revenue be credited to a newly created hyperbaric oxygen therapy inspection fund.

Why it matters

Operators of freestanding hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilities will face new annual licensing fees and equipment surcharges, while the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs gains specific regulatory oversight and inspection authority over these facilities.

Background
  • The legislation modifies Michigan's Public Health Code, which governs the licensure, safety standards, and regulation of health facilities and agencies across the state. context
  • House Bill 5592 was introduced in the Michigan House of Representatives during the 2025-2026 legislative session. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Freestanding hyperbaric oxygen therapy facility operators

Operators are subject to new initial licensing application fees, annual facility fees, chamber surcharges, and state inspection requirements.

Directly affected

Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

The department is tasked with issuing licenses, collecting fees, and conducting oversight and inspections of freestanding hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilities.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a freestanding hyperbaric oxygen therapy facility under this bill?
It is defined as a facility, other than a facility owned and operated as part of a hospital, in which one or more s are located.
What fees will freestanding hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilities have to pay?
They must pay an initial licensure application fee of $2,000.00, an annual facility license fee of $500.00, and $100.00 per .
Are home-use hyperbaric chambers subject to these new licensing rules?
No, chambers owned and operated by an individual for use only by that individual or their family members are excluded from the definition.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 3, 2026House
    bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026
  2. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform
  3. Feb 26, 2026HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  4. Feb 26, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced by Representative Rep. Julie Rogers

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Contingent Enactment Structure

The bill contains an enacting section making its effectiveness conditional on the passage of three specific companion bills (House Bills 5591, 5590, and 5593 or corresponding Senate bills).

Connected Entities

Jennifer Conlin, Sharon MacDonell, Julie Rogers and 8 more
PersonJennifer Conlin“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonSharon MacDonell“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonJulie Rogers“Primary sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonNoah Arbit“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonNatalie Price“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonThomas Kuhn“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonKelly Breen“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonStephanie Young“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonDonavan McKinney“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonPenelope Tsernoglou“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →
PersonErin Byrnes“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5592”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record