POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Iowa Senate Bill 335 Establishes Civil Penalties and Lawsuits for School Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Policy Violations

Original title: A bill for an act relating to education, including by modifying provisions related to trainings and curricula provided by school districts and prohibited sexual orientation and gender identity instruction, and implementing prohibitions related to the diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts of institutions of higher learning governed by the state board of regents, community colleges, and public schools.

Last action · February 25, 2025: Subcommittee recommends passage.Sponsors: Sandy Salmon and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Senate File 335 allows parents, guardians, and school employees to file civil lawsuits against school districts and public institutions of higher education for alleged violations of restrictions on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices, curricula, and prohibited instruction. Prevailing plaintiffs are awarded court costs, attorney fees, and civil penalties of $50,000 for K-12 schools or $100,000 for higher education institutions. The bill also institutes administrative warnings and licensing hearings through the for teachers and administrators.

Why it matters

School districts and higher education institutions face direct financial penalties of $50,000 to $100,000 per violation, mandatory employee terminations, and mandatory license revocations for educators if found in violation of restrictions on DEI efforts or prohibited curriculum.

Background
  • Current Iowa law restricts certain curricula, training, and instruction relating to gender identity and sexual orientation in kindergarten through grade six, alongside provisions governing teacher conduct. context
  • 2024 Iowa Acts, chapter 1152 initially established prohibitions regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion offices at public institutions of higher education governed by the board of regents. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

School districts

School districts face potential civil lawsuits, mandatory court costs, attorney fees, and $50,000 civil penalties for violations of curriculum and DEI restrictions.

Directly affected

Teachers and administrators

Educators are subject to written warnings, licensing hearings before the board of educational examiners, and potential license revocation for violations or failure to stop violations.

Directly affected

Students, parents, and guardians

Parents, guardians, and students gain the right to file civil actions for injunctive relief, report violations, and recover court costs and attorney fees if they prevail.

Directly affected

Community colleges and regents institutions

Public institutions of higher education are explicitly prohibited from maintaining DEI offices, face civil lawsuits from students and employees, and are subject to $100,000 civil penalties and mandatory employee termination upon a violation.

Key Facts

  • A parent, guardian, or school employee may bring a civil action for injunctive relief against a school district for alleged violations regarding curriculum stereotyping, sexual orientation and gender identity instruction, or DEI prohibitions.
  • If a plaintiff is the prevailing party in a civil action against a school district, the court must award reasonable court costs and attorney fees, and assess a $50,000 civil penalty against the school district.
  • Clerks of court must send copies of court orders finding violations to the board of educational examiners, which is required to revoke the license of a teacher or administrator found in violation.
  • If no civil action is instituted, the department of education may issue a written warning for a first violation and refer second or subsequent knowing violations to the board of educational examiners for a hearing.
Show all 8 facts
  • Dissatisfied parents, guardians, or employees may report violations to the state board of education, the attorney general, or bring a civil action for injunctive relief.
  • Community colleges are included within the definition of public institutions of higher education, subjecting them to existing statutory prohibitions regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion offices.
  • A student or employee at a public institution of higher education who alleges a DEI violation may bring a civil action for injunctive relief.
  • A prevailing plaintiff against a public institution of higher education is awarded court costs, attorney fees, and a $100,000 civil penalty, and the institution must immediately terminate the responsible employee.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can file a civil lawsuit under this bill against a school district?
A parent or guardian of a student enrolled in the school district, or an employee of the school district, may bring a civil action.
What happens to a school district if a plaintiff wins a civil lawsuit under the bill?
The court must award reasonable court costs and attorney fees, assess a $50,000 civil penalty against the school district, and send a copy of the order to the .
How are community colleges affected by the legislation?
The bill includes community colleges within the definition of public institutions of higher education, making them subject to statutory prohibitions regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and enforcement actions.
What is the penalty for a public institution of higher education that violates DEI prohibitions?
The court assesses a $100,000 civil penalty, awards court costs and attorney fees to the prevailing student or employee, and the institution must immediately terminate the responsible employee.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 25, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee recommends passage.
  2. Feb 20, 2025Senate
    Subcommittee Meeting: 02/25/2025 10:30AM Senate Lounge.
  3. Feb 19, 2025Senate
    Subcommittee: Salmon, Pike, and Quirmbach. S.J. 314 .
  4. Feb 17, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to Education. S.J. 279 .

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Expansion of Civil Liability to Educational Staff

The bill shifts enforcement from purely administrative state oversight to direct civil litigation initiated by parents, guardians, and employees against school districts and higher education institutions.

Connected Entities

Doug Campbell, Kevin Alons, Mike Pike and 6 more
PersonDoug Campbell“Bill cosponsor in the Senate”Map →
PersonKevin Alons“Bill cosponsor in the Senate”Map →
PersonMike Pike“Bill cosponsor in the Senate”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Educational Examiners“Conducts hearings and disciplinary actions for license holders”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Education“Investigates violations and issues written warnings”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“May receive reports and investigate violations”Map →
PersonDennis Guth“Bill cosponsor in the Senate”Map →
PersonDave Rowley“Bill cosponsor in the Senate”Map →
PersonSandy Salmon“Bill sponsor in the Senate”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.iowa.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record