POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Communications and Technology Legislation

Original title: LEGISLATIVE HEARING ON SEVEN COMMUNICATIONS BILLS

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing served as a formal legislative review of seven bills concerning communications infrastructure and 911 emergency response systems, which could impact how emergency services are accessed and how digital privacy is managed nationwide.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

911 Emergency Centers

These centers are the primary entities responsible for implementing changes to emergency response technology discussed in the legislation.

Wireless Service Providers

These companies are subject to the regulatory requirements and standards proposed in the communications bills.

Privacy Advocates

Groups like the ACLU provide input on how proposed technology mandates impact individual digital privacy rights.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House on Communications and Technology held a hearing on April 13, 2016, to discuss seven proposed communications bills. The session included testimony from public safety officials, privacy advocates, and family members of victims regarding the intersection of technology, emergency services, and digital privacy.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 13, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
  • The agenda focused on the review of seven distinct communications-related bills.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the ACLU, local 911 centers, the Kelsey Smith Foundation, and the wireless industry.
  • Testimony addressed the technical and legal challenges of modernizing 911 systems.
  • The hearing record includes prepared statements and answers to submitted questions from various stakeholders.
  • The document is identified as Serial No. 114-132 from the 114th Congress.

Why It Matters

This hearing served as a formal legislative review of seven bills concerning communications infrastructure and 911 emergency response systems, which could impact how emergency services are accessed and how digital privacy is managed nationwide.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather testimony and review seven specific bills related to communications and technology policy.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included family members of victims, 911 center directors, ACLU attorneys, and representatives from wireless industry associations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Historical Legislative Record

The document serves as a formal record of the 114th Congress, illustrating the legislative process for communications policy in 2016.

Connected Entities

personNathan WesslerStaff Attorney at the ACLUMap →
personHank HuntWitness and parent of Kari HuntMap →
personMelissa SmithWitness and Treasurer of the Kelsey Smith FoundationMap →
organizationCTIA--The Wireless AssociationIndustry trade group represented by witness Scott BergmannMap →
personAnna G. EshooRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personSteve SouderDirector of Fairfax County, Virginia 911 CenterMap →
personGreg WaldenChairman of the Subcommittee on Communications and TechnologyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record