POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas Prohibits State Government Diversity Offices, Mandatory Training, and Identity Statements

Original title: Relating to prohibiting governmental discriminatory practices as well as submissions and trainings that could lead to discriminatory treatment of individuals because of personal identity characteristics including an individual's race, color, ethnicity, sex, national origin or religion and the establishment of remedies and penalties for discriminatory treatment.

Last action · March 10, 2025: Referred to State AffairsSponsor: Alan Schoolcraft

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas state agencies, public universities, and local governments are prohibited from maintaining diversity offices, requiring diversity-related training, or requesting identity statements for hiring and admissions. Beginning January 1, 2026, individuals and the attorney general can sue to enforce the restrictions, and officials who knowingly violate them commit a misdemeanor punishable by fines up to $5,000 and jail time up to six months.

Why it matters

State and local public employees, public university staff, and students face a ban on mandatory training programs and application statements touching on concepts like implicit bias or critical race theory, while public agencies must eliminate administrative units dedicated to these initiatives.

Background
  • State legislative measures restricting diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in public institutions have been introduced in multiple states following national policy debates. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

governmental employers

State agencies, public universities, and local governments must eliminate diversity offices, halt mandatory training programs, and alter hiring and admissions procedures.

Directly affected

state employees

Directly affected

students

Enrollees in public educational systems and state programs are exempt from mandatory training and submission requirements related to personal identity characteristics.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of training are banned for state and local government workers?
Mandatory instructional programs and related materials that require employees or students to attend sessions promoting s, including concepts like critical race theory, implicit bias, or intersectionality, are banned.
Can public universities still consider diversity statements in admissions or hiring?
No. s, including institutions of higher education, are prohibited from requesting or compelling s, and cannot grant preferential consideration to individuals who provide them.
What penalties do officials face for violating these rules?
Beginning January 1, 2026, an official who knowingly violates the chapter commits a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $1,000 to $5,000, confinement in the county jail for one to six months, or both.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to State Affairs
  2. Mar 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Nov 13, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Comprehensive Public Sector DEI Ban

The bill systematically targets administrative units, mandatory training, and hiring statements across all state and local government entities, backed by both civil injunctions and criminal penalties.

Connected Entities

House Committee on State Affairs, Alan Schoolcraft
OrganizationHouse Committee on State Affairs“House committee reviewing the bill”Map →
PersonAlan Schoolcraft“Bill author in the lower house”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record