POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

House bill exempts multiemployer plan participants from automatic enrollment requirements

Original title: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an exception for multiemployer plan participants to the requirements for automatic enrollment.

Last action · December 12, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill creates an exception to federal requirements for participants in multiemployer retirement plans. It amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow these specific plan types to opt out of mandatory automatic enrollment rules.

Why it matters

This change impacts how retirement savings plans are structured for unionized workers and other participants in s, potentially altering how these plans manage enrollment and administrative compliance.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

multiemployer plan participants

These individuals are no longer subject to mandatory automatic enrollment requirements under the proposed amendment.

Directly affected

multiemployer plan administrators

These administrators gain the ability to operate plans without the federal automatic enrollment mandate.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a multiemployer plan?
A is a collectively bargained arrangement between a labor union and more than one employer, typically within the same industry.
What does this bill change regarding automatic enrollment?
It allows s to be exempt from federal rules that would otherwise require them to automatically enroll participants in retirement savings programs.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.Dec 12, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Exemption for Collective Bargaining Plans

The bill signals a legislative effort to carve out multiemployer plans from broader retirement plan mandates, likely to preserve the autonomy of collectively bargained structures.

Connected Entities

House Committee on Ways and Means, Internal Revenue Code of 1986
OrganizationHouse Committee on Ways and Means“The committee to which the bill was referred for review.”Map →
otherInternal Revenue Code of 1986“The federal tax code being amended by this bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record