POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas SB 405 bans training AI to encourage suicide, simulate humans, or provide emotional support

Original title: AN ACT concerning artificial intelligence; making it unlawful for a person to knowingly train artificial intelligence to encourage or support suicide or the unlawful killing of another person, provide emotional support, develop emotional relationships, act as a healthcare professional, simulate humans or encourage isolation; providing civil actions for violations, with potential recovery of damages, attorney fees and litigation costs; permitting courts to order equitable relief to correct unlawful conduct.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 405 prohibits individuals and businesses from knowingly training artificial intelligence systems to encourage suicide, unlawful killing, isolation, or to simulate human companionship and healthcare professionals. The measure authorizes the state attorney general and aggrieved individuals to file civil lawsuits seeking actual damages, $150,000 in , punitive damages, and injunctive relief.

Why it matters

The measure establishes statutory liability and civil penalties for developers who train conversational AI models to form emotional attachments with users or provide unauthorized medical or mental health guidance.

Background
  • SB 405 was introduced in the Kansas Senate during the 2025-2026 legislative session and ultimately died in committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Artificial intelligence developers

Developers face civil liability, statutory damages, and injunctions if they train artificial intelligence models to engage in prohibited interpersonal or healthcare simulation behaviors.

Directly affected

Individuals aggrieved by prohibited artificial intelligence interactions

Aggrieved individuals, or their legal representatives, gain the right to file civil lawsuits to recover damages, attorney fees, and seek court orders halting unlawful AI operations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of artificial intelligence systems are exempt from these restrictions?
Exemptions include customer service bots, business operational tools, productivity and internal research software, specific video game bots restricted from discussing mental health or explicit topics, and standalone consumer electronic speakers that do not sustain long-term relationships or elicit emotional responses.
What financial recovery is available to individuals harmed by a violation?
An individual may recover either actual damages (including emotional distress) or $150,000 in , alongside punitive damages, litigation costs, and reasonable attorney fees.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Feb 9, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Monday, February 9, 2026, 10:30 AM — Room 144-S
  3. Jan 29, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs
  4. Jan 28, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Kansas
locationKansas“Legislature of the State of Kansas”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record