Approval of Railroad 'Quiet Zone' Study and Union Pacific Reimbursement
January 25, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This action initiates the formal process to potentially reduce train horn noise at local crossings, involving city expenditures for professional consulting and railroad coordination.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Residents living near railroad crossings
These residents may experience changes in train horn noise levels depending on the outcome of the study and subsequent implementation.
Michael Baker International
The firm is contracted to perform professional services for the city.
Union Pacific Railroad
The railroad is involved in the study process and receives reimbursement for its services.
Last recorded activity January 25, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Why It Matters
This action initiates the formal process to potentially reduce train horn noise at local crossings, involving city expenditures for professional consulting and railroad coordination.
Key Facts
- The City Council authorized a contract with Michael Baker International for a railroad quiet zone study.
- The City Council authorized deposits for the reimbursement of services provided by Union Pacific Railroad.
- The legislative file number for this action is 17-037.
- The item was introduced on January 19, 2017.
- The status of the file is recorded as Passed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a 'quiet zone'?
Why is the city paying Union Pacific?
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Infrastructure Noise Mitigation
The city is actively pursuing federal/state quiet zone standards, indicating a shift toward prioritizing noise reduction in residential areas near rail lines.
Connected Entities
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance45How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools