Remote Access Security Act
April 7, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This bill expands the scope of federal export regulations to cover digital access to sensitive technology, meaning companies providing remote access to controlled items to foreign persons may now face new licensing or compliance requirements.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Technology and Cloud Service Providers
These companies may need to implement new compliance measures to monitor or restrict remote access to controlled items by foreign persons.
Foreign Nationals
Individuals located outside the U.S. may face new restrictions on their ability to remotely access sensitive U.S.-controlled technology.
Department of Commerce
The agency is tasked with promulgating regulations to define and enforce the new remote access controls.
Current stage: in_committee.
Floor Vote.
Summary
Why It Matters
This bill expands the scope of federal export regulations to cover digital access to sensitive technology, meaning companies providing remote access to controlled items to foreign persons may now face new licensing or compliance requirements.
Key Facts
- Defines 'remote access' as foreign person access to U.S.-controlled items via network connections, including the internet or cloud services, from a different physical location.
- Amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to explicitly include 'remote access' alongside 'export' and 'in-country transfer' as a regulated activity.
- Grants the Secretary authority to specify additional forms of remote access through future regulations.
- Requires that remote access by foreign persons be subject to the same regulatory oversight as physical exports.
- Updates multiple sections of the 2018 Act (sections 1752-1767) to ensure compliance, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms apply to remote access.
- Expands the scope of prohibited acts and documentation requirements to include remote access activities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this bill change?
Who is considered a 'foreign person' under this bill?
Does this affect cloud computing?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
388
Yes
366
No
22
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (388)
Andy Biggs
R · no
Andrea Salinas
D · yes
Suhas Subramanyam
D · yes
Jonathan Jackson
D · yes
Jefferson Van Drew
R · yes
Brian Fitzpatrick
R · yes
Chellie Pingree
D · yes
Glenn Ivey
D · yes
Robert Scott
D · yes
Mike Levin
D · yes
Kevin Mullin
D · yes
J. Correa
D · yes
Richard Hudson
R · yes
Raul Ruiz
D · yes
Frank Pallone
D · yes
Cleo Fields
D · yes
Glenn Grothman
R · yes
Pete Stauber
R · yes
Lisa McClain
R · yes
Jill Tokuda
D · yes
W. Steube
R · no
Jimmy Panetta
D · yes
Donald Davis
D · yes
Mark Alford
R · yes
+ 364 more
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Digital-Physical Parity
The bill signals a major policy shift toward treating digital access to technology as legally equivalent to the physical export of that technology.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools