POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on the History and Impact of Racial Discrimination in Housing

Original title: SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL: THE LEGACY OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing provides a formal legislative record of expert testimony regarding the long-term economic and social impacts of housing discrimination, which informs future federal housing policy and civil rights enforcement.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Housing policy researchers

These individuals provide the data and historical analysis that shape the committee's understanding of housing legislation.

Senate Banking Committee members

Committee members use the testimony to inform their legislative priorities and oversight of federal housing agencies.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript from a 2021 Senate Banking Committee hearing examining the historical legacy of racial discrimination in the U.S. housing market. Experts and lawmakers discussed how past policies and systemic barriers have shaped current housing disparities.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on April 13, 2021, via Webex.
  • The hearing marked the 53rd anniversary of the passage of the Fair Housing Act.
  • The committee established a 5-minute time limit for witness opening statements and Senator questions.
  • The hearing was conducted in a virtual format due to the COVID-19 pandemic era protocols.
  • The committee heard testimony from five expert witnesses representing various research and advocacy organizations.
  • The discussion focused on the historical context of housing discrimination, including the impact of the New Deal and Jim Crow-era policies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine the historical legacy of racial discrimination in housing and how past government policies have influenced current housing conditions.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Richard Rothstein (NAACP Legal Defense Fund), Lisa Rice (National Fair Housing Alliance), Jason Reece (Ohio State University), Howard Husock (Philanthropy Roundtable), and Tobias J. Peter (American Enterprise Institute).

Why It Matters

The hearing provides a formal legislative record of expert testimony regarding the long-term economic and social impacts of housing discrimination, which informs future federal housing policy and civil rights enforcement.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

temporal pattern100% confidence

Anniversary Alignment

The hearing was intentionally scheduled to coincide with the 53rd anniversary of the Fair Housing Act.

Connected Entities

personRichard RothsteinWitness, Senior Fellow Emeritus at NAACP Legal Defense and Educational FundMap →
personPatrick J. ToomeyRanking Member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsMap →
personTobias J. PeterWitness, Director of Research at American Enterprise InstituteMap →
personHoward HusockWitness, Executive Senior Fellow at Philanthropy RoundtableMap →
personSherrod BrownChairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsMap →
personLisa RiceWitness, President and CEO of National Fair Housing AllianceMap →
otherFair Housing ActFederal legislation prohibiting housing discriminationMap →
personJason ReeceWitness, Assistant Professor at The Ohio State UniversityMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record