POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP

Original title: NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO MUELLER & NAYLOR LLP lobbying for REDLANDS JOINT VENTURE LLC

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document confirms the end of a contract and clarifies that the reported payment was for services rendered in the final quarter of 1999 rather than new legislative activity.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Redlands Joint Venture LLC

The entity is the client that paid for lobbying services and is listed as the source of the reported funds.

Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP

The firm is the recipient of the lobbying payments and is responsible for filing the disclosure report.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This disclosure report details payments made by Redlands LLC to the law firm Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP for the first quarter of 2000. The report indicates that no active lobbying occurred during this period and that the professional relationship was terminated in late 1999.

Key Facts

  • The lobbying firm Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP reported receiving $104.5 from Redlands Joint Venture LLC.
  • The lobbying contract between the firm and the client was officially terminated on December 22, 1999.
  • No active lobbying work was performed by the firm during the period of January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2000.
  • The reported payment of $104.5 was for services provided during the 4th quarter of 1999.

Why It Matters

This document confirms the end of a contract and clarifies that the reported payment was for services rendered in the final quarter of 1999 rather than new legislative activity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did this firm lobby for any legislation in early 2000?
No, the report explicitly states that no legislation was actively lobbied during the first quarter of 2000.
Why was a payment reported if the contract was terminated?
The payment was for services rendered during the 4th quarter of 1999, prior to the contract's termination on December 22, 1999.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

temporal pattern100% confidence

Delayed Reporting

The payment reported in the Q1 2000 filing was specifically for services rendered in Q4 1999, indicating a lag between service and payment reporting.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment0
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record