POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on Federal Judiciary Ethics and Accountability

Original title: THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IN THE 21ST CENTURY: IDEAS FOR PROMOTING ETHICS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing explores potential legislative changes to how federal judges are held accountable, which could impact the standards of conduct and transparency requirements for all federal court members.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Judges

Any changes to ethics or accountability standards would directly govern the conduct and reporting requirements of federal judges.

The Public

The public is affected by the level of transparency and ethical oversight maintained within the judicial branch.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2019 House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing focused on potential reforms to improve ethics, accountability, and transparency within the federal court system. Experts and lawmakers discussed various proposals to address judicial conduct and public trust in the judiciary.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 21, 2019, by the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
  • The primary objective was to discuss ideas for promoting ethics, accountability, and transparency in the federal judiciary.
  • Four expert witnesses provided oral and written testimony: Amanda Frost, Gabe Roth, Russell Wheeler, and Charles Gardner Geyh.
  • A letter from James C. Duff, Secretary of the Judicial Conference of the United States, was submitted for the record.
  • The record includes various supplemental materials, including a 2011 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary and a white paper on judicial ethics and Supreme Court exceptionalism.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was convened to gather expert testimony and discuss potential legislative or policy ideas to improve ethics, accountability, and transparency within the federal court system.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Professor Amanda Frost, Mr. Gabe Roth (Fix the Court), Mr. Russell Wheeler (Brookings Institution), and Professor Charles Gardner Geyh.

Why It Matters

The hearing explores potential legislative changes to how federal judges are held accountable, which could impact the standards of conduct and transparency requirements for all federal court members.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Supreme Court Oversight

The inclusion of materials specifically addressing 'Supreme Court Exceptionalism' indicates a legislative interest in extending ethical standards to the highest court.

Connected Entities

personGabe RothExecutive Director, Fix the CourtMap →
personMartha RobyRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personAmanda FrostProfessor of Law, American University Washington College of LawMap →
personCharles Gardner GeyhProfessor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of LawMap →
personHenry C. Johnson, Jr.Chairman of the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the InternetMap →
personRussell WheelerVisiting Fellow, The Brookings InstitutionMap →
personJames C. DuffSecretary of the Judicial Conference of the United StatesMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record