POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana requires all-party notification for covert wearable video recordings of direct conversations

Original title: CIVIL/PROCEDURE: Requires notification of all parties to record in-person communication

Last action · June 25, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsors: Laurie Schlegel and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Louisiana requires individuals using wearable recording devices such as smart glasses to notify all participants before videoing, recording, or transcribing s, effective August 1, 2026. Violators face civil liability for damages, court costs, and attorney fees when from unlawful recording and dissemination are demonstrated. The statute exempts public meetings, law enforcement activities, emergencies, recordings made in a person's own residence or vehicle, and evidence-gathering for criminal or civil proceedings.

Why it matters

Residents using smart glasses or similar wearable recording gear in private or semi-private discussions face civil lawsuits and financial liability if they capture conversations without explicit prior notice to everyone involved.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals using wearable recording devices

Must provide specific prior notice to all conversation participants before recording or face civil liability and damages.

Directly affected

Participants in direct conversations

Gains the right to receive notification before being recorded via wearable devices and may sue for damages if unlawfully recorded.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Official activities are explicitly exempted from the all-party notification restrictions while performing duties.

Key Facts

  • Requires any participant in a direct conversation using a wearable eyeglass recording device to specifically notify all participants before videoing, recording, or transcribing the conversation.
  • Establishes civil liability for violators, making them liable for damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney fees upon demonstrating actual damages from unlawful recording and dissemination.
  • Exempts public or semi-public meetings, law enforcement activities, emergencies, and first responder activities from the notification requirement.
  • Exempts recordings of public officials performing official duties in public places, as well as recordings made to preserve evidence of public corruption or malfeasance in office.
Show all 9 facts
  • Exempts private citizens recording law enforcement officers in public places or where the citizen has a legal right to be, provided the individual does not physically interfere or materially obstruct the activity.
  • Exempts recordings made to preserve evidence related to an actual or anticipated civil, administrative, or criminal proceeding.
  • Exempts recordings made by a participant in their own residence, place of business, employment, or vehicle (or an employer's vehicle), and recordings where the person recording is not a participant.
  • Exempts incidental, unintended, or background capture of individuals or conversations occurring in public places where recording is not specifically directed at them.
  • Takes effect on August 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What devices does this law apply to?
The law specifically applies to s used by participants in a .
Are there exceptions for recording in my own home or car?
Yes. Recordings made by a participant in their own residence, place of business or employment, or their own or an employer's vehicle are exempt from the notification requirement.
What are the penalties for violating the notification rule?
A person who violates the chapter is liable to an individual for damages, including court costs and reasonable attorney fees, provided the claimant demonstrates resulting from the intentional unlawful recording and dissemination.
Can I record police officers under this law?
Yes. A private person may record a law enforcement officer performing official duties in a public place or a place where the person has a legal right to be, as long as they do not physically interfere or materially obstruct the officer.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Became law without the governor's signature.

Procedural history

33 actions
  1. Jun 25, 2026House
    Becomes Act No. 965 without the Governor's signature.
  2. Jun 25, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  3. Jun 4, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  4. Jun 1, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, reconsidered, returned to the calendar, under the rules.
  5. Jun 1, 2026House
    Called from the calendar.
  6. Jun 1, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, roll called, yeas 62, nays 27, Senate amendments concurred in.
Show 27 earlier actions
  1. Jun 1, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
  2. Jun 1, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate on 6/2/2026.
  3. May 31, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, roll called, yeas 46, nays 38, Senate amendments were not concurred in.
  4. May 31, 2026House
    Motion to reconsider pending.
  5. May 29, 2026Senate
    Called from the Calendar.
  6. May 29, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 30 yeas and 6 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
  7. May 29, 2026House
    Received from the Senate with amendments.
  8. May 29, 2026House
    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/31/2026.
  9. May 26, 2026Senate
    Rules suspended.
  10. May 26, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call.
  11. May 21, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  12. May 20, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  13. May 19, 2026Senate
    Reported with amendments.
  14. Apr 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
  15. Apr 13, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  16. Apr 9, 2026House
    Called from the calendar.
  17. Apr 9, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 54, nays 34. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  18. Apr 8, 2026House
    Notice given.
  19. Apr 8, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/09/2026.
  20. Apr 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, amended, returned to the calendar.
  21. Apr 1, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/07/2026.
  22. Mar 31, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  23. Mar 30, 2026House
    Reported with amendments (6-0-1).
  24. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
  25. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  26. Feb 25, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  27. Feb 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

New Civil Liability for Wearable Recording Devices

The statute creates a specific civil remedy for individuals covertly filmed via smart glasses or wearable tech without consent during direct conversations.

Connected Entities

Louisiana, Kathy Edmonston, Laurie Schlegel
locationLouisiana“State enacting the legislation”Map →
PersonKathy Edmonston“Representative who cosponsored House Bill No. 410”Map →
PersonLaurie Schlegel“Representative who sponsored House Bill No. 410”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record