POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas SB 409 Prohibits Cost-Sharing for Diagnostic and Supplemental Breast Exams

Original title: AN ACT concerning insurance; relating to health insurance coverage; requiring that a no cost-sharing requirement be imposed on insureds for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations for breast cancer.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died on Calendar

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Health insurance policies in Kansas would be required to eliminate deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations starting January 1, 2027, under a failed Senate bill.

Why it matters

Insured residents undergoing diagnostic or supplemental breast screenings would face zero out-of-pocket expenses for those specific imaging procedures once policies renew after January 1, 2027, provided their plan is not a high-deductible health plan structured for health savings accounts.

Background
  • SB 409 was introduced in the 2025-2026 session of the Kansas Legislature by the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance and died in committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Insured residents

Directly affected

Health insurance providers

Health insurance plans and health maintenance organizations must eliminate cost-sharing for covered diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations on policies issued or renewed after January 1, 2027.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of breast examinations are covered under the zero cost-sharing rule?
Diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations using equipment such as contrast-enhanced mammography, diagnostic mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, digital breast tomosynthesis, and molecular breast imaging.
Are high-deductible health plans paired with health savings accounts required to drop cost-sharing?
HSA-qualified health insurance policies are generally exempt from the cost-sharing ban to the extent needed to preserve their HSA-qualified status, unless the coverage falls under federal preventive care rules.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died on Calendar
  2. Feb 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed by
  3. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Monday, February 2, 2026, 9:30 AM — Room 546-S
  4. Jan 29, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance
  5. Jan 28, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Legislature of the State of Kansas, Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance
OrganizationLegislature of the State of Kansas“Body enacting the legislation”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance“Committee that introduced the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record