POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Committee Hearing on Food Waste Reduction

Original title: FOOD WASTE FROM FIELD TO TABLE

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and policy discussion regarding national food waste, which impacts agricultural efficiency, food prices, and the availability of resources for food-insecure populations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Agricultural producers

Producers are involved in the initial stages of the food supply chain where waste occurs and are subject to potential policy changes regarding food handling.

Food retailers and manufacturers

These entities manage large-scale food distribution and are involved in industry-wide sustainability initiatives discussed during the hearing.

Food-insecure populations

These groups are impacted by policies that determine how surplus food is recovered and redistributed.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Agriculture held a hearing on May 25, 2016, to examine the issue of food waste across the supply chain, from agricultural production to consumer consumption. The session featured testimony from industry experts, non-profit leaders, and legal scholars regarding strategies to reduce waste and improve food distribution.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on May 25, 2016, in Room 1300 of the Longworth House Office Building.
  • The session was titled 'Food Waste from Field to Table'.
  • The committee received testimony from seven expert witnesses representing non-profits, industry associations, and academia.
  • The hearing included the submission of written statements from the Can Manufacturers Institute and CropLife America.
  • The committee reviewed data and perspectives on food waste reduction through economics, supply chain management, and legal policy.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and policy discussion regarding national food waste, which impacts agricultural efficiency, food prices, and the availability of resources for food-insecure populations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The purpose was to gather expert testimony and discuss the challenges and potential solutions regarding food waste in the United States.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included representatives from the Natural Resources Defense Council, ReFED, L&M Companies, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, Feeding America, and Harvard Law School.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 4 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Food Recovery

The hearing highlights a shift toward integrating economic data and legal policy into food waste reduction strategies.

Connected Entities

personDiana AvivCEO of Feeding AmericaMap →
personCollin C. PetersonRanking Minority Member of the House Committee on AgricultureMap →
personChellie PingreeU.S. Representative from Maine and hearing witnessMap →
personJesse M. FinkManaging Director of MissionPoint Partners LLCMap →
personEmily M. Broad LeibDirector of the Food Law and Policy Clinic at Harvard Law SchoolMap →
personDana GundersSenior Scientist at the Natural Resources Defense CouncilMap →
personMeghan B. StaszSenior Director of Sustainability at the Grocery Manufacturers AssociationMap →
personJohn OxfordCEO of L&M CompaniesMap →
personK. Michael ConawayChairman of the House Committee on AgricultureMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record