POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri bill authorizes certain counties to put a tourism hotel tax up to 0.5% on voter ballots

Original title: TRANSIENT GUEST TAXES FOR TOURISM

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: Mike McGirl

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 1765 allows qualifying Missouri counties with specific population thresholds to impose a transient guest tax of up to 0.5% on hotel and motel rooms, provided the tax is first approved by local voters.

Why it matters

Residents in qualifying counties decide at the ballot box whether to fund local tourism promotion through a new charge on hotel and motel stays.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

transient guests of hotels or motels

Transient guests staying in hotels or motels in qualifying counties may pay a tax of up to one-half of one percent per occupied room per night if approved by voters.

Directly affected

qualified voters of the county

Qualified voters in eligible counties decide via ballot whether to authorize the transient guest tax.

Key Facts

  • Authorizes the governing body of a county with more than twenty-two thousand but fewer than twenty-five thousand inhabitants and a county seat with between two thousand three hundred and four thousand inhabitants to impose a transient guest tax.
  • Defines transient guests as persons occupying a hotel or motel room for thirty-one days or less during any calendar quarter.
  • Caps the lodging tax rate at a maximum of one-half of one percent per occupied room per night.
  • Requires the tax to be stated separately from all other charges and taxes.
Show all 7 facts
  • Mandates that all proceeds from the tax be used solely by the county to fund the promotion of tourism.
  • Prohibits the tax from taking effect unless approved by a majority of the county's qualified voters voting on the proposal.
  • Sets the effective date for an approved tax on the first day of the second calendar quarter following the election quarter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which counties are eligible to impose this hotel tax under the bill?
Counties with more than twenty-two thousand but fewer than twenty-five thousand inhabitants and a county seat with more than two thousand three hundred but fewer than four thousand inhabitants are eligible.
What can the tax revenue be used for?
The proceeds of the tax must be used by the county solely for funding the promotion of tourism.
Do voters have a say in whether the tax is applied?
Yes, the tax cannot take effect unless the county's governing body submits a proposal to the voters and a majority of those voting approve it.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Mike McGirl
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“General Assembly of the state of Missouri”Map →
PersonMike McGirl“Representative for District 118”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record