POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on Russian Disinformation and Influence Campaigns

Original title: DISINFORMATION: A PRIMER IN RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURES AND INFLUENCE CAMPAIGNS PANEL I

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held an open hearing to examine the history and methods of Russian '' and influence campaigns. Experts provided testimony on how these operations, which date back to the Soviet era, are used to target democratic institutions and the U.S. electoral process.

Why it matters

This hearing establishes the public record on how foreign intelligence operations target U.S. democratic processes, informing potential future legislative or policy responses to information warfare.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Electorate

The public is identified as the target of foreign influence campaigns intended to undermine democratic institutions.

Directly affected

Russian Government

The committee identifies this entity as the actor conducting the active measures and influence campaigns described in the hearing.

Key Facts

  • The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is conducting an independent review of Russian active measures used during the 2016 U.S. elections.
  • The committee held this hearing publicly to inform the American public about the nature of foreign influence campaigns.
  • Russian active measures are described as a continuation of historical Soviet-era intelligence tactics adapted for modern platforms.
  • The hearing is the first of two panels designed to provide a foundational understanding of Russian information warfare, propaganda, and cyber operations.
Show all 6 facts
  • The committee intends to hold additional open hearings on the topic of Russian active measures.
  • The committee asserts that the U.S. is currently a target of ongoing, sophisticated information warfare campaigns.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are 'active measures'?
The term refers to intelligence operations, including propaganda, information warfare, and cyber campaigns, used by Russia to influence foreign political outcomes and discredit democratic institutions.
Why was this hearing held in public?
The Committee leadership determined that the gravity of the threat to democratic institutions required a rare public discussion to ensure the American public understands the nature of these influence campaigns.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Public Transparency on Intelligence

The committee explicitly noted that holding an open hearing on an ongoing intelligence matter is a 'rare' step, indicating a shift toward public disclosure regarding Russian influence.

Connected Entities

Richard Burr, Eugene B. Rumer, Mark R. Warner and 3 more
PersonRichard Burr“Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence”Map →
PersonEugene B. Rumer“Witness, Director of the Russia and Eurasia Program at Carnegie Endowment for In”Map →
PersonMark R. Warner“Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence”Map →
PersonRoy Godson“Witness, Emeritus Professor of Government at Georgetown University”Map →
PersonClint Watts“Witness, Robert A. Fox Fellow at Foreign Policy Research Institute”Map →
OrganizationSelect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate“Congressional committee conducting the hearing”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record