POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

1965 Federal Public Works Appropriations Hearing

Original title: Public Works appropriations, 1965: hearings before the subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Eighty-eighth Congress, second session, on H.R. 11579, making appropriations for civil functions administered by the Department of the Army, certain agencies of the Department of the Interior, the Atomic Energy Commission, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and certain study commissions, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1965, and for other purposes: Bureau of Reclamation and Department of the Interior power marketing agencies.

July 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document outlines the legislative process for determining federal funding for major infrastructure, power, and water projects for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1965.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of the Army

The agency is seeking or receiving federal appropriations for civil functions.

Department of the Interior

The agency is subject to budget review for its power marketing and Bureau of Reclamation activities.

Atomic Energy Commission

The agency is subject to federal funding appropriations under this bill.

Tennessee Valley Authority

The agency is subject to federal funding appropriations under this bill.

What changed

Last recorded activity July 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of Senate subcommittee hearings regarding H.R. 11579, a bill to fund civil works projects for the 1965 fiscal year. The hearings focus on budget requests for the Department of the Army, the Department of the Interior, the Atomic Energy Commission, and the Tennessee Valley Authority.

Key Facts

  • The document concerns H.R. 11579, which provides appropriations for civil functions for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1965.
  • The hearings cover funding for the Department of the Army, Department of the Interior, Atomic Energy Commission, and the Tennessee Valley Authority.
  • Specific focus is placed on the Bureau of Reclamation and Department of the Interior power marketing agencies.
  • The proceedings were held by the subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations during the Eighty-eighth Congress, second session.

Why It Matters

This document outlines the legislative process for determining federal funding for major infrastructure, power, and water projects for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1965.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of these hearings?
The hearings are held to review and discuss the proposed budget allocations for various federal agencies involved in public works and energy projects for the 1965 fiscal year.
Which agencies are affected by this appropriations bill?
The bill covers the Department of the Army, the Department of the Interior, the Atomic Energy Commission, and the Tennessee Valley Authority.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Multi-agency infrastructure funding

The bill consolidates funding for diverse sectors including defense-related civil works, energy production, and water reclamation under a single appropriations act.

Connected Entities

organizationDepartment of the InteriorRecipient of appropriations for power marketing agencies and Bureau of ReclamatiMap →
organizationTennessee Valley AuthorityAgency subject to the appropriations bill.Map →
organizationAtomic Energy CommissionAgency subject to the appropriations bill.Map →
organizationUnited States Senate Committee on AppropriationsThe committee conducting the hearings.Map →
organizationDepartment of the ArmyRecipient of civil functions appropriations.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record