The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Correction to Senate Hearing Record on Valeant Pharmaceuticals
Record date · January 1, 2022
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is an official correction () for a 2016 U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging hearing transcript regarding Valeant Pharmaceuticals. It updates the record to correctly identify the .
The document ensures the accuracy of the official congressional record by correcting the name of the for the Special Committee on Aging during the 114th Congress.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Mark B. LeDuc
His professional title as Majority Staff Director is correctly attributed in the official record.
Priscilla Hanley
Her name is removed from the list of committee staff where it was incorrectly placed.
Key Facts
- The document serves as an official errata for Senate Hearing 114-846.
- The hearing was titled 'Valeant Pharmaceuticals' Business Model: The Repercussions for Patients and the Health Care System'.
- The hearing took place on April 27, 2016.
- Priscilla Hanley was incorrectly listed as the Majority Staff Director for the Special Committee on Aging in the original transcript.
Show all 5 facts
- Mark B. LeDuc is the correct individual who served as the Majority Staff Director for the Special Committee on Aging during the 114th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an errata?
Does this change the content of the hearing testimony?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Administrative Correction
The document highlights the importance of maintaining accurate historical records for congressional hearings.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance5How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy0Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment0Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz0Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools