POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota House Bill Authorizes Rules for Inclusive Examination Rooms in Healthcare Facilities

Original title: State Building Code; adoption of rules authorized to increase accessibility for examination rooms.

Last action · February 13, 2025: Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and PolicySponsors: Kim Hicks and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Minnesota House File 662 authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules using an to increase accessibility for persons with disabilities in examination rooms within health care and dental facilities.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

persons with disabilities

Accessibility standards for examination rooms in health care and dental facilities may be established or increased through new rules.

Directly affected

health care and dental facilities

Facilities may become subject to new accessibility requirements for examination rooms adopted by the commissioner.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does HF 662 authorize the commissioner to do?
The bill authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules using an to increase accessibility to examination rooms in health care and dental facilities for persons with disabilities.
Are higher education classes exempt from building accessibility rules for meetings?
Yes, classes, seminars, or training programs offered by the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities or the University of Minnesota are exempt from the meeting accessibility requirements.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

University of Minnesota, Council on Disability, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and 1 more
OrganizationUniversity of Minnesota“Exempted from meeting accessibility requirements for certain classes, seminars, ”Map →
OrganizationCouncil on Disability“Consulted by the commissioner for exemption criteria and symbol rules.”Map →
OrganizationMinnesota State Colleges and Universities“Exempted from meeting accessibility requirements for certain classes, seminars, ”Map →
OrganizationRehabilitation International“Eleventh World Congress adopted the wheelchair symbol.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment0
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record