The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota House Bill Authorizes Rules for Inclusive Examination Rooms in Healthcare Facilities
Last action · February 13, 2025: Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and PolicySponsors: Kim Hicks and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Minnesota House File 662 authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules using an to increase accessibility for persons with disabilities in examination rooms within health care and dental facilities.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
persons with disabilities
Accessibility standards for examination rooms in health care and dental facilities may be established or increased through new rules.
health care and dental facilities
Facilities may become subject to new accessibility requirements for examination rooms adopted by the commissioner.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does HF 662 authorize the commissioner to do?
Are higher education classes exempt from building accessibility rules for meetings?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment0Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
