POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR8478FEDERALin_committee

The RECON Act: Making Social Security Appeals Optional

Original title: RECON Act

April 23, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.Apr 23, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would change the legal appeals path for Social Security and SSI applicants by removing the mandatory review, potentially shortening the time it takes to reach a formal hearing for those denied benefits.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Social Security and SSI applicants

Applicants would gain the legal option to bypass the reconsideration stage of the appeals process.

Social Security Administration

The agency would be required to adjust its administrative procedures to allow direct hearing requests following initial denials.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

The RECON Act would allow Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) applicants to skip the '' step of the appeals process. This would allow individuals to request a hearing directly after an initial denial of benefits.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would change the legal appeals path for Social Security and SSI applicants by removing the mandatory review, potentially shortening the time it takes to reach a formal hearing for those denied benefits.

Key Facts

  • The bill eliminates the requirement for applicants to undergo a 'reconsideration' review before requesting a hearing for Social Security (Title II) or SSI (Title XVI) benefit denials.
  • The Commissioner of Social Security is prohibited from requiring reconsideration as a prerequisite to a hearing.
  • The Commissioner must provide an opportunity for a hearing upon the request of an applicant following an initial decision.
  • The changes apply to any initial decision or determination made on or after one year following the date of the Act's enactment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'reconsideration' process?
Currently, it is a mandatory administrative review step that applicants must complete after an initial denial of benefits before they can request a hearing before an administrative law judge.
If this bill passes, can I still choose to have a reconsideration review?
The bill makes the process optional, meaning you could choose to skip it and go straight to a hearing, but it does not explicitly forbid the agency from offering it as an option.
When would this change take effect?
The changes would apply to any initial benefit decisions made one year after the bill is signed into law.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

162 STRATEGIES

on behalf of Atticus Labs

2026

GOVERNMENT ISSUES

Issues related to Social Security disability technology resources, operations, policy, and adjudication. RECON Act (H.R. 8478).

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Streamlining Appeals

The bill represents a shift toward reducing administrative hurdles in the Social Security appeals process by removing a mandatory layer of review.

Connected Entities

otherSocial Security ActThe federal law being amended by this bill.Map →
organizationCommittee on Ways and MeansThe committee to which the bill was referred for review.Map →
personMrs. FousheeThe Representative who introduced the bill in the House.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record