The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Correction Notice: Tomah VAMC Hearing Transcript
Record date · January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is an official notice correcting the order of the congressional committees listed on the cover and title page of a 2015 joint hearing transcript regarding the Tomah Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
This document serves as a formal record correction to ensure the accurate attribution of the joint hearing held by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Veterans
The hearing concerns the quality and access to healthcare services provided at the Tomah VAMC.
Key Facts
- The document is an official errata notice for the hearing transcript S. Hrg. 114-427.
- The original cover and title page incorrectly listed the order of the participating committees.
- The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs should have been listed first.
- The Committee on Veterans' Affairs should have been listed second.
Show all 5 facts
- The hearing took place on March 30, 2015, during the 114th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an errata?
Does this change the content of the hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Administrative Correction
The document highlights the importance of accurate committee attribution in official congressional records.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance10How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy0Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment0Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
