POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas bill bans prone restraints on juveniles in detention and intake facilities

Original title: AN ACT concerning children and minors; relating to the revised Kansas juvenile justice code; prohibiting the use of any prone restraint on a juvenile who is in custody at a juvenile detention facility or juvenile correctional facility or being assessed as part of the juvenile intake and assessment system; amending K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 38-2302 and repealing the existing section.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

HB 2227 prohibits the use of any face-down on juveniles held in juvenile correctional facilities, detention facilities, or undergoing intake and assessment, and updates definitions in the Kansas juvenile justice code.

Why it matters

Changes safety protocols and physical management rules for youth in state custody, impacting procedures for staff at juvenile facilities and intake centers across Kansas.

Background
  • HB 2227 was introduced during the 2025-2026 legislative session in the Kansas lower house by the Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Juveniles in custody

Directly affected

Juvenile correctional and detention facility staff

Staff members are legally prohibited from utilizing prone restraint techniques on juveniles during custody or assessment.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly is a prone restraint under this bill?
The bill defines a as the use of any manual restraint that places a person in a face-down position.
Where does the ban on prone restraints apply?
The ban applies to juveniles in custody at juvenile correctional facilities, juvenile detention facilities, or undergoing assessment as part of the .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026House
    Died in Committee
  2. Feb 4, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Feb 4, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Codification of Restraint Restrictions

The bill explicitly integrates physical restraint prohibitions into the revised Kansas juvenile justice code alongside administrative definitions.

Connected Entities

House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice, Larned juvenile correctional facility, Kansas juvenile correctional complex
OrganizationHouse Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice“Legislative committee sponsoring HB 2227”Map →
OrganizationLarned juvenile correctional facility“Juvenile correctional facility operated by the secretary of corrections”Map →
OrganizationKansas juvenile correctional complex“Juvenile correctional facility operated by the secretary of corrections”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record