Part ofsocial media →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Social Media Content Filtering

Original title: FILTERING PRACTICES OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS

January 1, 2018

social media content moderation internet regulation free speech technology policy

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing established the congressional record regarding how private social media companies monitor content, which informs ongoing debates about the regulation of online speech and platform liability.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Social Media Companies

These companies are the subject of congressional inquiry regarding their internal content moderation policies.

Social Media Users

Users are subject to the filtering and moderation practices implemented by the platforms they use.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on April 26, 2018, to investigate how major social media companies manage and filter user-generated content. The committee examined the tension between the platforms' stated goals of being and their actual business practices regarding content moderation.

Key Facts

The hearing took place on April 26, 2018, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
70% of Americans use social media to connect, engage with news, or share information.
68% of U.S. adults use Facebook.
Nearly 75% of U.S. adults use YouTube.
40% of 18 to 24-year-olds use Twitter.
Social media companies monitor content to prevent illegal activities such as fraud, piracy, identity theft, and sex trafficking.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was this hearing held?

To examine the methods social media companies use to filter and manage the large volume of content created by their users.

Which platforms were specifically discussed?

Facebook, YouTube (a subsidiary of Google), and Twitter.

Why It Matters

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Transition from Neutrality to Moderation

The hearing highlights a shift in the perception of social media companies from neutral platforms to active curators of content.

Facebook YouTube Twitter

Connected Entities

personMarsha Blackburn“U.S. Representative from Tennessee, witness.”Map →

organizationHouse Committee on the Judiciary“The committee conducting the hearing.”Map →

personBob Goodlatte“Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.”Map →

organizationTwitter“Social media platform discussed regarding user demographics.”Map →

personLynnette Hardaway“Social media personality, witness.”Map →

personRochelle Richardson“Social media personality, witness.”Map →

organizationFacebook“Social media platform discussed regarding market dominance.”Map →

organizationYouTube“Social media platform discussed regarding user demographics.”Map →

personJim Himes“U.S. Representative from Connecticut, witness.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance75
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy65
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment40
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz30
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools