POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Microbeads in Cosmetic Products

Original title: EXAMINING MICROBEADS IN COSMETIC PRODUCTS

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript record of a May 1, 2015, House hearing regarding the use of plastic in personal care products. The hearing focused on the environmental impact of these materials and discussed legislative efforts, specifically H.R. 1321, to address their use.

Why it matters

The hearing examined potential federal regulations on the use of plastic in consumer products, which directly impacts the manufacturing standards for cosmetic companies and environmental water quality policies.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Cosmetic and personal care product manufacturers

These companies face potential changes to product formulation requirements and manufacturing standards.

Directly affected

Environmental advocacy groups

These groups are involved in advocating for policies to reduce plastic pollution in waterways.

Key Facts

  • The Subcommittee on Health held a hearing on May 1, 2015, to discuss the regulation of plastic microbeads in cosmetics.
  • The hearing specifically reviewed H.R. 1321, a bill concerning the use of microbeads.
  • Witnesses included representatives from state environmental agencies, state legislatures, environmental advocacy groups, and the personal care product industry.
  • The Personal Care Products Council provided testimony regarding industry perspectives on microbead regulation.
Show all 5 facts
  • The Alliance for the Great Lakes provided testimony regarding the environmental impact of microbeads.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are microbeads?
are small plastic particles often used in cosmetic and personal care products for exfoliation.
What was the purpose of this hearing?
The purpose was to examine the environmental impact of and discuss potential federal legislation (H.R. 1321) to regulate their use.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Transition to Federal Regulation

The hearing marks a shift from state-level environmental concerns regarding microbeads to a federal legislative approach.

Connected Entities

John Hurson, Joseph R Pitts, Linda R. Greenstein and 2 more
PersonJohn Hurson“Executive Vice President of the Personal Care Products Council”Map →
PersonJoseph R Pitts“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Health”Map →
PersonLinda R. Greenstein“New Jersey State Senator”Map →
PersonMolly Flanagan“Representative of the Alliance for the Great Lakes”Map →
PersonDan Wyant“Director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record