The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Correction to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Hearing Record
Record date · January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document serves as an official notice to correct the title of a 2015 House Committee on Veterans' Affairs hearing transcript. The original title omitted the specific , which is now confirmed as 2016.
This correction ensures that the official congressional record accurately identifies the specific budget request being discussed, which impacts how researchers and the public track federal spending for veterans' services.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Veterans
The budget request discussed in the hearing determines the funding levels for services and programs provided to veterans.
Key Facts
- The official title of the hearing is 'U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2016'.
- The original document cover omitted the year '2016' from the title.
- The hearing was held on Wednesday, February 11, 2015.
- The hearing was conducted by the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the U.S. House of Representatives during the 114th Congress.
Show all 5 facts
- The document is identified as Serial No. 114-7.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an errata?
Does this change the content of the budget hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Correction of Historical Record
The document highlights the importance of maintaining accurate metadata for congressional hearing records to ensure proper archival retrieval.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance10How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy0Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment0Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
