POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Senate Bill 1010 Modifies Landowner Liability Provisions for All-Terrain Vehicle Operation

Original title: Limiting landowner liability for operation of all-terrain vehicles

Last action · February 19, 2026: To JudiciarySponsor: Mark Maynard

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 1010 amends West Virginia Code §19-25-5 to adjust definitions and limitations regarding landowner liability for all-terrain vehicle operation and recreational land use.

Why it matters

The measure alters the legal protections and potential liability exposure for property owners whose land is used by all-terrain vehicle riders and other recreational participants.

Background
  • West Virginia property statutes govern landowner liability for recreational activities such as hunting, fishing, and all-terrain vehicle riding under Article 25 of Chapter 19. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

landowners

Property owners, tenants, and lessees have their legal liability thresholds defined and regulated regarding recreational visitors and all-terrain vehicle operators.

Directly affected

all-terrain vehicle operators

Individuals operating all-terrain vehicles on private or covered land are subject to statutory definitions governing recreational access and fees.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the bill change regarding landowner liability?
The bill amends West Virginia Code §19-25-5 to update definitions and liability limitations for landowners whose property is used for all-terrain vehicle riding and other recreational activities.
Is there a fee limit for recreational use under these liability rules?
Yes, for general recreational or wildlife propagation purposes, the monetary amount asked in return for an invitation to enter the land cannot exceed $50 a year per recreational participant, with specific exceptions such as the Hatfield-McCoy Regional Recreation Authority.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 19, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Judiciary
  2. Feb 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate
  3. Feb 19, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Feb 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Mark Maynard, Hatfield-McCoy Regional Recreation Authority, West Virginia Legislature and 1 more
PersonMark Maynard“Senate sponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationHatfield-McCoy Regional Recreation Authority“Referred to in code provisions regarding recreational vehicle activities”Map →
OrganizationWest Virginia Legislature“Legislative body considering the bill”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Environmental Protection“Agency involved in wildlife propagation land certifications”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record