POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on North Korea Policy

Original title: ASSESSING THE MAXIMUM PRESSURE AND ENGAGEMENT POLICY TOWARD NORTH KOREA

Record date · January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript from a 2017 Senate subcommittee hearing regarding U.S. policy toward North Korea. Senators and expert witnesses discussed the effectiveness of '' and diplomatic engagement in response to North Korea's nuclear and missile testing programs.

Why it matters

The hearing outlines the U.S. government's strategic approach to North Korea's nuclear program, which directly impacts national security, military readiness, and international diplomatic relations.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Military

The military is responsible for implementing deterrence strategies and responding to potential threats from North Korea.

Directly affected

North Korea

The regime is the subject of U.S. economic and diplomatic pressure campaigns discussed in the hearing.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on July 25, 2017, before the Senate Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy.
  • North Korea conducted two nuclear tests and 24 ballistic missile launches in 2016.
  • North Korea conducted 17 missile launches in the first half of 2017, including an intercontinental ballistic missile test on July 4.
  • China accounts for approximately 90 percent of North Korea's total trade.
Show all 7 facts
  • Trade volume between China and North Korea increased from $488 million in 2000 to $5.4 billion in 2015.
  • The subcommittee's stated policy goal is the peaceful denuclearization of North Korea through economic and diplomatic pressure.
  • The U.S. government maintains that all options, including military tools, remain on the table to deter North Korea.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to assess the U.S. government's '' and engagement policy toward North Korea in light of its nuclear and missile development.
Why is China mentioned in the hearing?
China is identified as the primary economic partner of North Korea, accounting for 90 percent of its trade, and is viewed as having the most leverage to influence the North Korean regime.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift to Maximum Pressure

The hearing marks a formal legislative pivot toward a 'maximum pressure' strategy in 2017, emphasizing economic leverage over China.

Connected Entities

Susan A. Thornton, Leon V. Sigal, China and 3 more
PersonSusan A. Thornton“Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs”Map →
PersonLeon V. Sigal“Director, Northeast Asia Cooperative Security Project”Map →
locationChina“Identified as the primary economic partner of North Korea”Map →
PersonKim Jong Un“Leader of North Korea”Map →
PersonCory Gardner“Chairman of the Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybers”Map →
PersonBruce Klingner“Senior Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record