POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing: The Future of Iranian Terror and Threats to the U.S.

Original title: THE FUTURE OF IRANIAN TERROR AND ITS THREAT TO THE U.S. HOMELAND

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2016 House Subcommittee hearing regarding the potential threats posed by Iranian-backed terror networks to the United States. Experts provided testimony on Iran's regional activities and the implications of the Iranian nuclear agreement.

Why it matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of Congressional oversight regarding U.S. national security policy toward Iran, specifically addressing concerns about and the impact of the 2015 nuclear agreement.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

The agency is responsible for implementing policies and strategies discussed during the hearing regarding national security threats.

Directly affected

Iranian Government

The regime is the subject of the subcommittee's investigation and policy critique.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on February 11, 2016, in the Cannon House Office Building.
  • The subcommittee examined the future of Iran's use of terror proxies and the threat to the U.S. homeland.
  • Chairman Peter T. King expressed formal opposition to the Iranian nuclear agreement.
  • The Chairman cited the release of photographs of U.S. sailors detained in Iran as evidence of the regime's nature.
Show all 6 facts
  • The hearing included testimony from three experts: Tzvi Kahn, Ilan Berman, and Bilal Y. Saab.
  • The subcommittee is part of the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The subcommittee met to hear expert testimony on the future of Iran's use of and the potential threat these networks pose to the United States.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses were Tzvi Kahn (Foreign Policy Initiative), Ilan Berman (American Foreign Policy Council), and Bilal Y. Saab (Atlantic Council).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Post-Nuclear Agreement Oversight

The hearing highlights the immediate legislative pushback and oversight efforts following the signing of the Iranian nuclear agreement.

Connected Entities

Ilan Berman, Bilal Y. Saab, Peter T. King and 3 more
PersonIlan Berman“Vice President, American Foreign Policy Council”Map →
PersonBilal Y. Saab“Senior Fellow, Atlantic Council”Map →
PersonPeter T. King“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence”Map →
PersonBrian Higgins“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
OrganizationSubcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence“The body conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonTzvi Kahn“Senior Policy Analyst, Foreign Policy Initiative”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment30
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record