POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofIRS
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing: IRS Oversight and TIGTA Update

Original title: IRS: TIGTA UPDATE, PART TWO

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing examines the accountability of the IRS regarding allegations of politically motivated targeting and the agency's compliance with document s during a congressional investigation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

IRS

The agency is the subject of the investigation regarding its internal practices and document retention policies.

Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)

TIGTA is responsible for investigating the IRS and providing updates to the congressional committee.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing on June 25, 2015, to receive an update from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration () regarding ongoing investigations into IRS targeting practices. The hearing focused on allegations that the IRS targeted groups based on political beliefs and concerns regarding the preservation of agency documents.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 25, 2015, by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
  • The committee investigated allegations that the IRS targeted individuals based on their political beliefs.
  • Chairman Chaffetz stated that former IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman previously testified to Congress that no such targeting occurred.
  • A preservation order was issued to the IRS to maintain documents related to the investigation.
  • In August 2013, then-Chairman Darrell Issa issued a subpoena for IRS documents.
  • The hearing included testimony from J. Russell George and Tim Camus of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).
  • The committee entered into the record an email from Mr. Milholland (IRS) regarding Information Retention Policy Revision.
  • The committee entered into the record a letter from Gladys Hernandez (TIGTA) to Chairman Chaffetz.

Why It Matters

This hearing examines the accountability of the IRS regarding allegations of politically motivated targeting and the agency's compliance with document s during a congressional investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to receive an update from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration regarding investigations into IRS targeting practices.
Who testified at this hearing?
J. Russell George, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, and Tim Camus, the Deputy Inspector General for Investigations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

IRS Document Retention

The hearing record includes evidence of an IRS Information Retention Policy Revision, which was a point of contention regarding the preservation of documents.

Connected Entities

organizationHouse Committee on Oversight and Government ReformCongressional committee conducting the hearingMap →
personJ. Russell GeorgeTreasury Inspector General for Tax AdministrationMap →
personDoug ShulmanFormer IRS CommissionerMap →
personTim CamusDeputy Inspector General for Investigations, TIGTAMap →
personJason ChaffetzChairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformMap →
organizationIRSInternal Revenue ServiceMap →
personDave CampFormer Chairman of the Ways and Means CommitteeMap →
personDarrell IssaFormer Chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform CommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record