POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Local Impact

Proposed Contract for SoundThinking, Inc. Technology Services

Original title: P.H. 2024-57: (PUBLIC HEARING 2ND READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE A MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF POMPANO BEACH AND SOUNDTHINKING, INC., PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Fiscal Impact: $1,706,250 over 5 years) FIRST READING: JULY 9, 2024 POSTPONED FROM JULY 23, 2024

Record date · September 10, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

The Pompano Beach City Commission considered an ordinance to approve a five-year, $1.7 million with SoundThinking, Inc. The item was ultimately from the agenda after being postponed from a previous meeting.

Why it matters

The city proposed a $1,706,250 expenditure over five years for services from SoundThinking, Inc., a company that provides public safety technology, though the ordinance is currently marked as .

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

SoundThinking, Inc.

The company was the proposed vendor for a five-year master services agreement with the city.

Directly affected

Pompano Beach taxpayers

The city budget would have been impacted by the $1,706,250 expenditure over five years.

Key Facts

  • The ordinance (P.H. 2024-57) was marked as 'Stricken' from the City Commission agenda.
  • The proposed contract with SoundThinking, Inc. carried a total fiscal impact of $1,706,250.
  • The contract term for the proposed agreement was five years.
  • The ordinance had its first reading on July 9, 2024.
Show all 6 facts
  • The item was previously postponed from the July 23, 2024, meeting.
  • The ordinance included a severability clause, which allows parts of the contract to remain valid if other parts are found legally unenforceable.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the status of this ordinance?
The ordinance is currently marked as ',' meaning it was removed from the commission's consideration.
How much would this contract have cost the city?
The fiscal impact was estimated at $1,706,250 over a five-year period.
What does 'severability' mean in this context?
It is a legal provision ensuring that if one part of the contract is declared invalid by a court, the remainder of the agreement stays in effect.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Legislative Removal

The ordinance was moved to a 'Stricken' status after being postponed once, indicating a change in the commission's legislative schedule.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record