POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofZoning →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Zoning Change Request for 3.03 Acres in Greater Palm River

Original title: Application Number: RZ-STD 24-1180 Applicant: HARTFORD LLC Location: 550ft W of S 70th St & Hartford St Intersection, S of the Hartford St. Folio Number: 47349.0100 & 47350.0200 Acreage: 3.03 acres, more or less Comprehensive Plan: RES-6 Service Area: Urban Community Plan: Greater Palm River Existing Zoning: ASC-1 Request: Rezone to AS-1(R) RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Hearing Master: Approval Development Services: Approval Planning Commission: Inconsistent with Plan

Record date · March 11, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a request by Hartford LLC to rezone 3.03 acres of land located south of Hartford Street from to . The application has received conflicting recommendations from local planning authorities.

Why it matters

The approval of this rezoning request changes the legal land-use designation for 3.03 acres, which dictates the types of development permitted on the site.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

HARTFORD LLC

The applicant is seeking a change in land-use regulations for their property.

Indirectly affected

Greater Palm River residents

Local residents are affected by changes to land-use designations within their community plan area.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current zoning of the property?
The property is currently zoned as .
What is the proposed zoning?
The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to .
Do the planning authorities agree on this request?
No. While the Zoning Hearing Master and Development Services recommended approval, the Planning Commission found the request inconsistent with the .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Conflicting Planning Recommendations

There is a notable disagreement between the Planning Commission, which found the request inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the Zoning Hearing Master/Development Services, which recommended approval.

Connected Entities

Zoning Hearing Master, BOCC Land Use, HARTFORD LLC and 1 more

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record