POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

House Judiciary Committee Member Day Hearing Summary

Original title: MEMBER DAY HEARING

Record date · January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is the official record of a '' hearing held by the House Judiciary Committee on September 20, 2019. During this session, members of Congress who do not serve on the committee were invited to present testimony and advocate for their legislative priorities.

Why it matters

This hearing provides a formal platform for non-committee members of Congress to bring specific legislative issues to the attention of the House Judiciary Committee, potentially influencing the committee's future agenda.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Members of Congress

Non-committee members used this platform to present their legislative priorities to the Judiciary Committee.

Directly affected

House Judiciary Committee

The committee received testimony and documentation from other members of Congress to inform their legislative work.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on Friday, September 20, 2019.
  • The hearing was held by the House Committee on the Judiciary during the 116th Congress.
  • The purpose of the hearing was to allow non-committee members of Congress to provide testimony.
  • 15 members of Congress provided oral testimony during the hearing.
Show all 6 facts
  • Representative Dan Newhouse submitted 10 letters for the record from various tribal councils and organizations regarding issues in Washington State.
  • Additional statements were submitted for the record by Representatives Lisa Blunt Rochester, Tony Cardenas, and Rick Crawford.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'Member Day' hearing?
It is a hearing where members of Congress who are not on a specific committee are given the opportunity to testify before that committee about their legislative priorities.
What was the outcome of this hearing?
The document serves as a record of testimony and submitted materials; it does not list specific legislative outcomes or votes taken during the session.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Tribal Advocacy Focus

Representative Dan Newhouse used the hearing to submit a significant number of letters from tribal organizations, indicating a focus on indigenous issues in his district.

Connected Entities

House Committee on the Judiciary, Louie Gohmert, Nadler, Jerrold and 2 more
OrganizationHouse Committee on the Judiciary“The committee hosting the hearing.”Map →
PersonLouie Gohmert“Member of the Committee.”Map →
PersonNadler, Jerrold“Chair of the Committee.”Map →
PersonDan Newhouse“Member of Congress who submitted multiple letters for the record.”Map →
PersonMary Gay Scanlon“Vice-Chair of the Committee.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record