POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Digital Copyright Piracy

Original title: DIGITAL COPYRIGHT PIRACY: PROTECTING AMERICAN CONSUMERS, WORKERS, AND CREATORS

Record date · January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet held a hearing on December 13, 2023, to discuss the impact of digital piracy on consumers, workers, and creators. Industry experts and legal representatives provided testimony regarding the current state of copyright protection in the digital age.

Why it matters

This hearing serves as a formal fact-finding session that may influence future federal legislation regarding digital copyright enforcement and internet platform liability.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Content Creators and Producers

Their intellectual property rights and revenue streams are directly impacted by digital piracy.

Directly affected

Technology and Internet Platforms

They are subject to potential changes in liability and enforcement regulations regarding copyrighted content on their platforms.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on December 13, 2023, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The session focused on the protection of intellectual property against digital piracy.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the film industry, sports broadcasting, and the technology sector.
  • The subcommittee received written testimony and oral statements from four primary witnesses.
Show all 6 facts
  • The record includes additional statements from the Association of American Publishers.
  • The hearing resulted in a series of follow-up questions and responses for the record between the subcommittee and witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To examine the challenges of digital and its effects on American consumers, workers, and creators.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Richard Gladstein (FilmColony), Riche T. McKnight (UFC), Matthew Schruers (CCIA), and Karyn A. Temple (Motion Picture Association).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Focus on Digital Enforcement

The hearing highlights a continued legislative focus on updating copyright enforcement mechanisms for the digital era.

Connected Entities

Richard Gladstein, Henry C. Johnson, Jr., Karyn A. Temple and 3 more
PersonRichard Gladstein“Witness, Producer and Executive Director at Brooklyn College Feirstein Graduate ”Map →
PersonHenry C. Johnson, Jr.“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonKaryn A. Temple“Witness, Global General Counsel for Motion Picture Association”Map →
PersonMatthew Schruers“Witness, President of Computer & Communications Industry Association”Map →
PersonRiche T. McKnight“Witness, General Counsel for Ultimate Fighting Championship”Map →
PersonDarrell Issa“Chair of the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record